Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts

Monday, June 23, 2025

The struggle of the people against imperialism must be strengthened!

 Joint Statement of Communist and Workers’ Parties

The Communist and Workers’ Parties signing this Joint Statement strongly condemn the US attack on Iran, which escalates the military offensive already launched by Israel.
After Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and the ongoing genocide in Palestine, the USA and its allies are now shedding the blood of yet another country in the Middle East. This imperialist aggression is plunging people into war across a wider region and threatening to destroy humanity as a whole.
The Communist and Workers’ Parties are demanding an immediate end to the escalation of the war against Iran by the USA, NATO and Israel. We also call on people to strengthen their struggle against war, foreign military bases, troop deployments abroad, military equipment and nuclear weapons.
Solidarity with the people of Iran, Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and all other peoples in the region must be strengthened.
 
SolidNet Parties

  • Communist Party of Albania
  • Algerian Party for Democracy and Socialism
  • Communist Party of Armenia
  • Communist Party of Australia
  • Party of Labour of Austria
  • Democratic Progressive Tribune, Bahrain
  • Communist Party of Bangladesh
  • Brazilian Communist Party
  • Communist Party of Britain
  • New Communist Party of Britain
  • Communist Party of Canada
  • Communist Party of Chile
  • Colombian Communist Party
  • Socialist Workers' Party of Croatia
  • Communist Party of Bohemia & Moravia
  • Communist Party of Denmark
  • Communist Party of El Salvador
  • German Communist Party
  • Communist Party of Greece
  • Communist Party of India
  • Iraqi Communist Party
  • Tudeh Party of Iran
  • Communist Party of Ireland
  • Workers Party of Ireland
  • Communist Party of Israel
  • Socialist Movement of Kazakhstan
  • Communist Party of Mexico
  • New Communist Party of the Netherlands
  • Communist Party of Norway
  • Communist Party of Pakistan
  • Palestinian Communist Party
  • Palestinian Peoples Party
  • Paraguayan Communist Party
  • Peruvian Communist Party
  • Philippines Communist Party [PKP 1930]
  • Communist Party of Poland
  • Romanian Socialist Party
  • Communist Party of the Soviet Union
  • Communists of Serbia
  • South African Communist Party
  • Communist Party of the Workers of Spain
  • Communist Party of Sri Lanka
  • Communist Party of Sweden
  • Syrian Communist Party
  • Swiss Communist Party
  • Communist Party of Turkey
  • Communist Party of Ukraine
  • Union of Communists of Ukraine
  • Communist Party USA
  • Communist Party of Venezuela

Other Parties
  • Argentinian Communist Party
  • Revolutionary Brazilian Communist Party 
  • Communist Workers' Party – For Peace and Socialism (Finland)
  • Communist Revolutionary Party of France 
  • Communist Party (Germany)
  • Communist Front (Italy)
  • Communist Workers' Platform USA

Friday, March 01, 2024

Hobson’s Choice

The American presidential election is being viewed with increasing trepidation in Westminster and the other chancelleries of Europe. Not surprisingly considering the choice facing the electorate – a senile old man in thrall to the most aggressive and venal sections of the American ruling class or Donald Trump, whose calls for trade wars and tariffs could easily trigger a global slump not seen since the Wall Street Crash of 1929.
Though Trump is ahead in the opinion polls at the moment that could easily change if the movers and shakers in the Democratic Party dump Joe Biden in favour of a new leader to face the challenge in November. Many favour Michelle Obama, a lawyer and author, whose only claim to high office is that she is the wife of President Barack Obama and served as the First Lady of the United States from 2009 to 2017. Needless to say the views of bourgeois politicians this side of the Atlantic will count for nothing in their calculations.
Gone are the days when British politicians on both sides of the House could pose as equals to their American counter-parts and talk about a “special relationship” with US imperialism. Gone – like the dream of the Franco-German bourgeoisie of an independent European Union that could play off East against West or the nonsensical “Third Way” of the Blairites which, in itself, was just another version of the Keynesian economic model pioneered by Fascist Italy and the Third Reich in the 1930s. 
In the old days British imperialism bragged about the Empire on which "the sun never set" while the German imperialists talked of "world domination". United States imperialism has always been more subtle. After the Second World War it made a bid to control the economic development of the world through the Marshall Plan and its dominance of the fledgling United Nations. This was thwarted by the opposition of the Soviet Union and the new people's democracies. During the Cold War much of the world was divided between the rival spheres of influence of the United States and the USSR. However the end of the Soviet Union enabled the United States to reinforce its grip on Western Europe.
Western European leaders still pose as equals of the Americans in the NATO alliance but in reality they’ve been forced to accept the model of subservience imposed on Japan by US imperialism after its defeat in 1945.
Dependent on American protection to defend their own global interests they destroyed the Yugoslav federation and the Libyan Jamahuriya at Washington’s behest. They fan the flames of war in Ukraine and the Middle East and prolong the unhappy partition of many countries including Cyprus, Ireland, Kashmir and Korea.
Now all they can do is watch as the drama of the race to the White House plays out. Whether Michelle Obama can mobilise the same rainbow coalition that swept her husband into the White House in 2008 is another matter. Biden’s blanket support for Israeli aggression has alienated Arab-Americans as well as large sections of the Black and Muslim community that has traditionally supported the Democrats in the past. Whether they will return to the fold will ultimately depend on Biden’s departure and a more even-handed approach to the Palestinians in the run-up to the election.


Monday, July 27, 2020

Pages of Our History: Charles H Kerr & Co


Charles Hope Kerr
By Robin McGregor

Charles H Kerr & Co is not a particularly well-known name on this side of The Pond but it is possible that some readers will at have a few books from this Chicago publishing company on their bookshelf from when it was the main labour movement publisher in the days before the First World War.
Charles Hope Kerr was born in 1860, the son of a mathematics teacher at a boys’ school in the American state of Georgia. His parents were abolitionists helping slaves escape via the underground railway, an activity which forced them to take advantage of it and flee the state northwards, where his father became professor of Greek at Madison University.
Originally a Protestant Congregationalist, after graduating in Romance languages from his father’s university in 1881 Kerr started working as a clerk at a Chicago publishing house specialising in producing material for the Unitarian cause. Here he gained skills on which he built a long, productive, if not financially rewarding career.
Amongst his early achievements he dramatically boosted the circulation of the denominational paper Unity from 1,600 in 1883 to 8,000 by 1891. From 1886 it was published by a company bearing his name. The contents of Unity were not to the taste of the more conservative Unitarians, and even the more liberal ones were not pleased by Kerr penning a favourable review of an anarchist work in the pages of a Unitarian church journal.
This hastened his departure from Unitarianism and the company was re-established as an independent entity in 1893. One-thousand shares costing $10 each were issued. Of these, $500 was taken up by Kerr, a few wealthy supporters chipped in, but most went to supporters for whom the chance of discounts on future publications was the main attraction. A new monthly, first entitled New Occasions and then New Time, dealing with a mixture of progressive religious and secular views achieved a circulation of 30,000. When it was sold to its Editor it soon collapsed, suggesting that having Kerr’s hand at the tiller was vital.
The timing of the launch was not a good one: soon afterwards a trade depression struck. He managed to survive by appealing to supporters to invest small sums in what he described as a co-operative venture.
Although the company described itself a co-operative, it seems to be something of a one-man band, indeed not a few follow workers denounced him on this very point. In 1894 Kerr bravely published The Pullman Strike by William Carwardine, which was a sympathetic account of the recent important strike by the Chicago railwaymen that no other local publisher would dare touch as a result of pressure from George Pullman himself. This was just one book in an extensive list from a dazzling range of progressive viewpoints ranging from anarchism, bimetallism, evolutionism, feminism, and the Single Tax cause.
Kerr was never a man to adhere to a single cause for long. By the turn of the century he had abandoned his Populism for Marxism and became an active member of the most left-wing section of the Socialist Party of America.
This was the party, founded in 1901, that obtained 900,000 votes in the 1912 presidential election. It was an unsteady and varied coalition of socialists, trade unionists, municipal reformers, populist farmers, immigrants and a few Afro-American intellectuals. Despite winning mayoral positions and Congressmen, participation in elections was frowned upon by members of syndicalist tendencies. Its opposition to American participation in the First World War saw a few members leave in protest – but the Bolshevik Revolution presented another challenge, with many of those supporting it leaving to join the new Communist Party.
The Socialist Party had a national newspaper, the Appeal to Reason, that was commercially produced. This was a positive choice for the party, which feared that an editorial board would become an unwanted power in its own right. This also had the advantage of allowing Kerr to publish for the party but was never bound by its more right-wing leadership, and in turn the leadership was not embarrassed by any of Kerr’s mix of authors.
Much of his output took the form of pamphlets and small books in series such as The Pocket Library of Socialism and the Library of Science for the Workers, in distinctive red, new-fangled cellophane covers. The latter series included his best seller Shop Talks in Economics, written by his associate Mary Marcy in 1911. This was a basic introduction to Marxist economics, which sold two million copies and was translated into languages as diverse as Chinese and Finnish. These were priced very cheaply at five cents a copy, but $6 could allow branches to buy 1,000 copies of similar booklets.
On a much more ambitious scale he supported the massive task of translating the first complete English translation of the second and third volumes of Marx’s Das Kapital. Their familiar red-covered volumes were taken up by the London publisher Swan Sonneschein, who reprinted them frequently for decades. The publication of Socialist Songs with Music, the first such American collection, was a lighter product of his press.
His publications were generally small and cheap booklets, so they had little appeal for general booksellers who could not make a profit on them unless they could be sure of large sales. Instead, most of the business was by mail-order, with the books and pamphlets being advertised in his International Socialist Review (ISR) and other left wing periodicals, or sold via sympathetic unions and meetings of branches of the Socialist Party.
Kerr’s output was not limited to books and pamphlets. It produced educational playing cards, postcards and board games, but it is likely that the ISR was Kerr’s most important publication. Established in July 1900, it was originally a worthy intellectual publication with 800 subscribers. A revamp in 1908 with better paper and illustrations took circulation from 4,000 to a peak of 45,000 copies by 1911, boosted by such techniques as offering cheap copies of his books and pamphlets to new subscribers.
Regular subscription income from periodicals are often a mainstay for publishers because, being paid in advance, it gives a cushion for the more unpredictable income from book sales which, even if successful, only comes in after they are sold. It is reasonable to assume that a successful periodical allowed the company to produce low-margin books. A more unusual promotional offer made by Kerr was giving a phonograph to subscribers taking out a 25-year subscription.
Sadly, anyone taking up this offer would not have received a quarter-of-a-century worth of magazines. It closed in 1918 when the Federal authorities, armed with draconian war-time censorship powers, banned the ISR from the mailing system because it opposed American involvement in the First World War. Violent attacks on the Socialist Party by police and vigilantes had an indirect effect on Kerr as well as a direct one.
In 1917 a War Department spy visited Kerr’s shop hoping to buy anti-war literature to incriminate him but was told he could not because the book in question was banned. Instead he sent some other books published by Kerr to his bosses in Washington. They were not impressed to be sent older works by Marx and Kautsky and other 19th century works that were not banned, and the translation of Plato’s Republic by Kerr’s father. In 1918 the Canadian government made it illegal for any Canadian to possess any literature published by Charles H Kerr & Co, under penalty of a $5,000 fine or five years' imprisonment, a worthy if back-handed tribute to his work.
Rising paper costs and disruption of the transatlantic trade in the early war years hit the company and the circulation of the ISR declined.
 Apart from this, Kerr was badly hit financially when the union leader Bill Haywood unexpectedly fled to the Soviet Union whilst out on bail when appealing against a 20-year sentence. Kerr had contributed substantially towards the bail fund, which was, of course, lost.
This and the subsequent violent and legal repression of the Left in the Red Scare after the war ensured that the later history of the Company was at best one of only marginal significance.
Exhausted from his tireless and financially ill-rewarded labours Kerr finally retired at the age of 68 in 1928, but not before handing over the firm to the Proletarian Party of America (PPA), which had emerged from the left-wing part of the Michigan section of the Socialist Party of America. Kerr himself spent the last 16 years of his life in retirement living in Los Angeles with the sister of Mary Marcy before dying in 1944.
The PPA was the sort of regional party that found Communist Party discipline irksome. In the 1930s Kerr’s company published only a few new books, mostly by the PPA’s leader, but its backlist of classics kept it in business.
The Communist Party’s own International Publishers was founded in 1924 and soon took over the task of publishing the works of Marx and Lenin, aided by the Party’s contacts with the Soviet Union. With his background, it is unlikely that Kerr would have taken well to Bolshevik discipline.
The PPA finally closed in 1971 but the publishing firm remained in the hands of some Chicago radicals attached to the syndicalist Industrial Workers of the World (IWW). Instead of being wound up as expected, it found a new niche market of publishing works of labour history that included several chronicling the battles it took part in. Its looks as though its last book was published in 2015 because the page on the publisher’s website for forthcoming books is blank.


Readers interested in seeking more details should consult Allen Ruff’s We Called each Other Comrade: Charles H Kerr & Company, Radical Publishers. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press 1997 and 2011, which is the standard history of the firm but is a bit weak on the relatively unimportant post-First World War period.

Monday, May 11, 2020

USA: Guns in a time of coronavirus


By Ray Jones

Perhaps I shouldn’t have been surprised when I heard that guns sales in the USA had soared with the onset of the coronavirus pandemic but I was a little shocked. For a moment I had a mad vision of armed Americans roaming the streets in search of viruses to shoot!
But it would seem that usually mild, non-armed people are afraid that desperate intruders will attack their homes and steal their food and goods during the lockdown. To assist the defenders, many states have designated gun shops as essential services and free to open!
Over 3.5 million new background checks were requested by gun shops in March according to the FBI and whilst this does not exactly correlate with sales it gives you an idea. It also gives you an idea of the Government’s attitude to gun sales that there are not more accurate figures. This response by so many Americans gives, I think, an insight into deeply held attitudes.
Some years ago a relation of mine living near Detroit, Michigan, saw an intruder (we might say ‘trespasser’) one evening in the gardens behind her home. She called the police and the officers quickly arrived, but by then intruder had already disappeared. “Why didn’t you shoot him?” the officers wanted to know and were shocked to be told that there were no guns in the house.
Academics in the USA have pointed out statistically guns in a house are not much of a deterrent. Guns are, in fact, rarely used in defence of homes and are no more effective than other methods of defence. Also, guns in the home can have serious effects.
Domestic violence more easily leads to murder with a gun in the house. If there is a firearm in a home with a history of domestic violence there is a 500 per cent higher chance that a woman will die, and in a time of lockdown and isolation that is likely to get higher.
Accidents with bored children finding poorly secured guns must surely increase. Already every year there are over 450 “unintentional” firearm deaths in the USA and over 20,000 injuries. Eight kids and teens were killed or injured every day before the pandemic – how many now?
To many people in Britain, I suspect that that the gun situation in the USA borders on insanity – but of course it has historical and economic roots.
The USA can be said to have been founded on the thieving of land and the massacre of indigenous peoples, the ownership of black slaves by a white upper class, the exploitation of working people by capitalists, and imperialist wars to maintain the power and profits of a tiny minority.
But oppression breeds resistance and in an enormous, sometimes lawless, country it can be difficult for the ruling class to ensure that weapons stay in the ‘right’ hands and the pressures inside the ruling class often conflict.
A section of that class, largely the Democrats, want more restrictions on arms to make controlling ‘unruly’ elements easier. Whilst the arms industry, led by the National Rifle Association (NRA), is constantly trying to maintain and increase its profits.
Some arms companies, such as American Outdoor Brands who own Smith &Wesson and Sturm Ruger, have seen a small drop in their share price recently and are in great hopes of the present environment.
Generally speaking, Republicans and conservatives firmly support the ownership of guns based on (the much disputed) Second Amendment to the Constitution and the desire to protect their property and families.
The American Left can be said to be divided between those who think more gun control of a type would be better for workers and oppressed groups than the status quo, and those who believe it would inevitably be used as part of the oppression.
Duke Aaron of the Redneck Revolt Network (a group of armed workers that fights white supremacy and promotes community defence) says: “Firearms are legislated like the rest of the country is legislated: completely compromised and geared towards control and capital. Gun laws predominately favour people who can afford firearms [Good quality pistols cost $300–$400] and gun control has a long history rooted in the idea that white supremacy needs to keep guns out of the hands of people of colour…” And: “If something happens what are we supposed to do? Call the cops and wait hours for them to turn up and shrug their shoulders or even sometimes shoot us?”
Minnie Bruce Pratt writing in Workers’ World, paper of the Workers’ World Party, said: “…the disproportionate number of deaths of people of colour, people with disabilities and genderqueer people at the hands of police…belies the wisdom of relying on the US state to safeguard our lives” and: “Instead, we can turn to the many examples of mutual help and self-defence.”
Marc Bodine, Chair of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) in Washington State, says that although the CPUSA does not have an official position on gun ownership he believes that most of its members support the Second Amendment and the right to own guns but also “common sense” restrictions to those rights. He thinks that having lots of guns around will not alter the balance of political power, the State will always have more fire power, but he supports the right of people’s movements to defend themselves against armed attacks by the State.