Showing posts with label CPUSA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CPUSA. Show all posts

Saturday, July 10, 2021

THE COMMUNIST AND WORKERS’ PARTIES CONDEMN NATO’S COLD WAR RHETORIC

JOINT STATEMENT

 The Communist and Worker’s Parties of the NATO member states wish to say in a loud and clear voice that we condemn the aggressive anti-communist rhetoric coming out of the latest meeting of NATO leadership. The US, the de-facto leader of the NATO alliance has made it clear that its interests lie in igniting a “new Cold War” centered around anti-Chinese and anti-communist propaganda. This is a threat to all workers around the world.  

Since the infamous “Pivot to Asia” under President BarackObama, it has been clear that the US capitalist elite has seen the rising successes and power of the People’s Republic of China as a threat to itsunipolar, neoliberal world order. During the administration of Donald Trump, the US government became increasingly aggressive in its anti-China and anti-socialist policies and many began to talk about a “new Cold War”. 

Some might have hoped that with the election of a new president, the US might become less hostile towards The People’s Republic of China (PRC), but they would now be greatly disappointed. In many ways, the foreign policy of the Biden presidency has amped up the hostility towards China and its largest strategic ally, Russia. 

At the most recent meeting of the leaders of NATO alliance - an alliance’s that owes its whole existence to policies of anti-communist aggression – “new Cold War” rhetoric was abundant. NATO’s general secretary Jan Stoltenberg even said that “the rise of China” presents a security threat to NATO. Why does the world’s largest country lifting itself out of poverty constitute a security threat to the NATO powers? The answer is that it doesn’t. It does however constitute a threat to US hegemony and capitalist’s profits. 

Both China and its strategic ally Russia, find themselves surrounded on all sides by hundreds of US and NATO military bases. Despite promises to not expand in to Eastern Europe, NATO has continuously expanded closer and closer to Russia’s borders and is aiding anti-Russian, fascist forces in Ukraine while using economic sanctions to punish the people of Russia. 

The world cannot be allowed to descend into another anti-communist Cold War. Despite the name, the Cold War of the 20th Century was more often than not a hot war and cost the lives of millions of people around the globe. From South East Asia to Africa and Latin America, millions of workers, those seeking freedom and a better world for themselves and their families were slaughtered in the name of global capitalism.These wars did not spare the youth of the U.S. and its military allies 

History cannot be allowed to repeat itself in an even more dangerous form. 

No new Cold War!

 


 

Solidnet Parties Signing 

  1. Communist Party of Albania
  2. Communist Party of Australia
  3. Democratic Progressive Tribune-Bahrain
  4. Communist Party of Bangladesh
  5. Brazilian Communist Party
  6. Communist Party of Brazil
  7. New Communist Party of Britain
  8. Columbian Communist Party
  9. Socialist Workers’ Party of Croatia
  10. Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia
  11. Communist Party of Denmark
  12. Communist Party of Finland
  13. French Communist Party
  14. German Communist Party
  15. Hungarian Workers’ Party
  16. Tudeh Party of Iran
  17. Communist Party of Kurdistan-Iraq
  18. Communist Party of Ireland
  19. Workers’ Party of Ireland
  20. Party of the Communist Refoundation
  21. Socialist Party of Lithuania
  22. Communist Party of Norway
  23. Philippine Communist Party (PKP-1930)
  24. Communist Party of Spain
  25. Communist Party of the Peoples of Spain
  26. Communist Party of Ukraine
  27. Communist Party USA

 

Other Parties Signing

  1. Communist Party of Aotearoa
  2. Galizan People's Union-UPG
  3. Communist Party of the Donetsk People’s Republic
  4. Proletariat Schweiz

Tuesday, March 30, 2021

Claudia Jones: A life of struggle

by Ben Soton

 The Political Life and Times of Claudia Jones: David Horsley; CPB Books & Pamphlets; London 2020, £4.95.

This pamphlet is both an insight into the life of a remarkable woman and a history of the struggles of black people in the Caribbean, the USA, and Britain. It describes the life of Claudia Jones, famous for the establishment of the Notting Hill Carnival.
     Claudia was born in Trinidad in 1915 and as a child immigrated to the United States where she joined the Communist Party of the USA (CPUSA). She was deported to Britain in 1955 where she became involved in progressive and anti-racist politics as a member of the Communist Party of Great Britain.
    The pamphlet discusses how the CPUSA tried to tackle racism within its membership as well as US society as a whole. It also covers the highly contentious issue of whether or not Black Americans in the Deep South constitute a separate nation, a view once upheld by the CPUSA which supported self-determination for the Black Belt in the 1932 election.
     The anti-fascist nature of World War II strengthened revisionism within the CPUSA under the leadership of Earl Browder. However, Browder, who attempted to liquidate the Communist Party, was removed from the leadership and replaced by William Z Foster.
    Browder’s class collaborationist position was further weakened with the Cold War and the emergence of the pro-fascist Joseph McCarthy and the growing influence of the Congressional House Un-American Activities Committee. McCarthy, who defended Nazi war-criminals, led a wave of persecution against progressives and communists in particular.
    I have often asked why it is acceptable or even patriotic to fly the Confederate flag in some parts of the United States. Surely the Confederacy, a state based on slavery, was not only a thoroughly reactionary one but one based on a rebellion against the United States? Perhaps our comrades on the other side of the pond should call for the banning of the Confederate flag as well as statues of slave owners on the grounds of their ‘Un-American’ activity.
    The McCarthy era with its fascist persecution led to Claudia’s deportation to Britain in 1955. Whilst in this country she was able to travel to the Soviet Union; a country that had solved its own race relations problem in a matter of years. I am told that the United States is still working on theirs.
     Throughout her life Claudia suffered from the effects of childhood tuberculosis; a condition exacerbated by her time in prison during the McCarthy era. The effects of condition led to her untimely death in 1964.
    The recent upsurge in the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has led to an interest in Black History. If the BLM is to take a class based, anti-imperialist direction, rather than a corporate logo used to promote the latest pair of trainers then it is important to promote the lives of people like Claudia Jones. I strongly suggest all comrades of all colours read this pamphlet that can be ordered online on the Communist Party of Britain (CPB) website.

Monday, July 27, 2020

Pages of Our History: Charles H Kerr & Co


Charles Hope Kerr
By Robin McGregor

Charles H Kerr & Co is not a particularly well-known name on this side of The Pond but it is possible that some readers will at have a few books from this Chicago publishing company on their bookshelf from when it was the main labour movement publisher in the days before the First World War.
Charles Hope Kerr was born in 1860, the son of a mathematics teacher at a boys’ school in the American state of Georgia. His parents were abolitionists helping slaves escape via the underground railway, an activity which forced them to take advantage of it and flee the state northwards, where his father became professor of Greek at Madison University.
Originally a Protestant Congregationalist, after graduating in Romance languages from his father’s university in 1881 Kerr started working as a clerk at a Chicago publishing house specialising in producing material for the Unitarian cause. Here he gained skills on which he built a long, productive, if not financially rewarding career.
Amongst his early achievements he dramatically boosted the circulation of the denominational paper Unity from 1,600 in 1883 to 8,000 by 1891. From 1886 it was published by a company bearing his name. The contents of Unity were not to the taste of the more conservative Unitarians, and even the more liberal ones were not pleased by Kerr penning a favourable review of an anarchist work in the pages of a Unitarian church journal.
This hastened his departure from Unitarianism and the company was re-established as an independent entity in 1893. One-thousand shares costing $10 each were issued. Of these, $500 was taken up by Kerr, a few wealthy supporters chipped in, but most went to supporters for whom the chance of discounts on future publications was the main attraction. A new monthly, first entitled New Occasions and then New Time, dealing with a mixture of progressive religious and secular views achieved a circulation of 30,000. When it was sold to its Editor it soon collapsed, suggesting that having Kerr’s hand at the tiller was vital.
The timing of the launch was not a good one: soon afterwards a trade depression struck. He managed to survive by appealing to supporters to invest small sums in what he described as a co-operative venture.
Although the company described itself a co-operative, it seems to be something of a one-man band, indeed not a few follow workers denounced him on this very point. In 1894 Kerr bravely published The Pullman Strike by William Carwardine, which was a sympathetic account of the recent important strike by the Chicago railwaymen that no other local publisher would dare touch as a result of pressure from George Pullman himself. This was just one book in an extensive list from a dazzling range of progressive viewpoints ranging from anarchism, bimetallism, evolutionism, feminism, and the Single Tax cause.
Kerr was never a man to adhere to a single cause for long. By the turn of the century he had abandoned his Populism for Marxism and became an active member of the most left-wing section of the Socialist Party of America.
This was the party, founded in 1901, that obtained 900,000 votes in the 1912 presidential election. It was an unsteady and varied coalition of socialists, trade unionists, municipal reformers, populist farmers, immigrants and a few Afro-American intellectuals. Despite winning mayoral positions and Congressmen, participation in elections was frowned upon by members of syndicalist tendencies. Its opposition to American participation in the First World War saw a few members leave in protest – but the Bolshevik Revolution presented another challenge, with many of those supporting it leaving to join the new Communist Party.
The Socialist Party had a national newspaper, the Appeal to Reason, that was commercially produced. This was a positive choice for the party, which feared that an editorial board would become an unwanted power in its own right. This also had the advantage of allowing Kerr to publish for the party but was never bound by its more right-wing leadership, and in turn the leadership was not embarrassed by any of Kerr’s mix of authors.
Much of his output took the form of pamphlets and small books in series such as The Pocket Library of Socialism and the Library of Science for the Workers, in distinctive red, new-fangled cellophane covers. The latter series included his best seller Shop Talks in Economics, written by his associate Mary Marcy in 1911. This was a basic introduction to Marxist economics, which sold two million copies and was translated into languages as diverse as Chinese and Finnish. These were priced very cheaply at five cents a copy, but $6 could allow branches to buy 1,000 copies of similar booklets.
On a much more ambitious scale he supported the massive task of translating the first complete English translation of the second and third volumes of Marx’s Das Kapital. Their familiar red-covered volumes were taken up by the London publisher Swan Sonneschein, who reprinted them frequently for decades. The publication of Socialist Songs with Music, the first such American collection, was a lighter product of his press.
His publications were generally small and cheap booklets, so they had little appeal for general booksellers who could not make a profit on them unless they could be sure of large sales. Instead, most of the business was by mail-order, with the books and pamphlets being advertised in his International Socialist Review (ISR) and other left wing periodicals, or sold via sympathetic unions and meetings of branches of the Socialist Party.
Kerr’s output was not limited to books and pamphlets. It produced educational playing cards, postcards and board games, but it is likely that the ISR was Kerr’s most important publication. Established in July 1900, it was originally a worthy intellectual publication with 800 subscribers. A revamp in 1908 with better paper and illustrations took circulation from 4,000 to a peak of 45,000 copies by 1911, boosted by such techniques as offering cheap copies of his books and pamphlets to new subscribers.
Regular subscription income from periodicals are often a mainstay for publishers because, being paid in advance, it gives a cushion for the more unpredictable income from book sales which, even if successful, only comes in after they are sold. It is reasonable to assume that a successful periodical allowed the company to produce low-margin books. A more unusual promotional offer made by Kerr was giving a phonograph to subscribers taking out a 25-year subscription.
Sadly, anyone taking up this offer would not have received a quarter-of-a-century worth of magazines. It closed in 1918 when the Federal authorities, armed with draconian war-time censorship powers, banned the ISR from the mailing system because it opposed American involvement in the First World War. Violent attacks on the Socialist Party by police and vigilantes had an indirect effect on Kerr as well as a direct one.
In 1917 a War Department spy visited Kerr’s shop hoping to buy anti-war literature to incriminate him but was told he could not because the book in question was banned. Instead he sent some other books published by Kerr to his bosses in Washington. They were not impressed to be sent older works by Marx and Kautsky and other 19th century works that were not banned, and the translation of Plato’s Republic by Kerr’s father. In 1918 the Canadian government made it illegal for any Canadian to possess any literature published by Charles H Kerr & Co, under penalty of a $5,000 fine or five years' imprisonment, a worthy if back-handed tribute to his work.
Rising paper costs and disruption of the transatlantic trade in the early war years hit the company and the circulation of the ISR declined.
 Apart from this, Kerr was badly hit financially when the union leader Bill Haywood unexpectedly fled to the Soviet Union whilst out on bail when appealing against a 20-year sentence. Kerr had contributed substantially towards the bail fund, which was, of course, lost.
This and the subsequent violent and legal repression of the Left in the Red Scare after the war ensured that the later history of the Company was at best one of only marginal significance.
Exhausted from his tireless and financially ill-rewarded labours Kerr finally retired at the age of 68 in 1928, but not before handing over the firm to the Proletarian Party of America (PPA), which had emerged from the left-wing part of the Michigan section of the Socialist Party of America. Kerr himself spent the last 16 years of his life in retirement living in Los Angeles with the sister of Mary Marcy before dying in 1944.
The PPA was the sort of regional party that found Communist Party discipline irksome. In the 1930s Kerr’s company published only a few new books, mostly by the PPA’s leader, but its backlist of classics kept it in business.
The Communist Party’s own International Publishers was founded in 1924 and soon took over the task of publishing the works of Marx and Lenin, aided by the Party’s contacts with the Soviet Union. With his background, it is unlikely that Kerr would have taken well to Bolshevik discipline.
The PPA finally closed in 1971 but the publishing firm remained in the hands of some Chicago radicals attached to the syndicalist Industrial Workers of the World (IWW). Instead of being wound up as expected, it found a new niche market of publishing works of labour history that included several chronicling the battles it took part in. Its looks as though its last book was published in 2015 because the page on the publisher’s website for forthcoming books is blank.


Readers interested in seeking more details should consult Allen Ruff’s We Called each Other Comrade: Charles H Kerr & Company, Radical Publishers. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press 1997 and 2011, which is the standard history of the firm but is a bit weak on the relatively unimportant post-First World War period.

Monday, May 11, 2020

USA: Guns in a time of coronavirus


By Ray Jones

Perhaps I shouldn’t have been surprised when I heard that guns sales in the USA had soared with the onset of the coronavirus pandemic but I was a little shocked. For a moment I had a mad vision of armed Americans roaming the streets in search of viruses to shoot!
But it would seem that usually mild, non-armed people are afraid that desperate intruders will attack their homes and steal their food and goods during the lockdown. To assist the defenders, many states have designated gun shops as essential services and free to open!
Over 3.5 million new background checks were requested by gun shops in March according to the FBI and whilst this does not exactly correlate with sales it gives you an idea. It also gives you an idea of the Government’s attitude to gun sales that there are not more accurate figures. This response by so many Americans gives, I think, an insight into deeply held attitudes.
Some years ago a relation of mine living near Detroit, Michigan, saw an intruder (we might say ‘trespasser’) one evening in the gardens behind her home. She called the police and the officers quickly arrived, but by then intruder had already disappeared. “Why didn’t you shoot him?” the officers wanted to know and were shocked to be told that there were no guns in the house.
Academics in the USA have pointed out statistically guns in a house are not much of a deterrent. Guns are, in fact, rarely used in defence of homes and are no more effective than other methods of defence. Also, guns in the home can have serious effects.
Domestic violence more easily leads to murder with a gun in the house. If there is a firearm in a home with a history of domestic violence there is a 500 per cent higher chance that a woman will die, and in a time of lockdown and isolation that is likely to get higher.
Accidents with bored children finding poorly secured guns must surely increase. Already every year there are over 450 “unintentional” firearm deaths in the USA and over 20,000 injuries. Eight kids and teens were killed or injured every day before the pandemic – how many now?
To many people in Britain, I suspect that that the gun situation in the USA borders on insanity – but of course it has historical and economic roots.
The USA can be said to have been founded on the thieving of land and the massacre of indigenous peoples, the ownership of black slaves by a white upper class, the exploitation of working people by capitalists, and imperialist wars to maintain the power and profits of a tiny minority.
But oppression breeds resistance and in an enormous, sometimes lawless, country it can be difficult for the ruling class to ensure that weapons stay in the ‘right’ hands and the pressures inside the ruling class often conflict.
A section of that class, largely the Democrats, want more restrictions on arms to make controlling ‘unruly’ elements easier. Whilst the arms industry, led by the National Rifle Association (NRA), is constantly trying to maintain and increase its profits.
Some arms companies, such as American Outdoor Brands who own Smith &Wesson and Sturm Ruger, have seen a small drop in their share price recently and are in great hopes of the present environment.
Generally speaking, Republicans and conservatives firmly support the ownership of guns based on (the much disputed) Second Amendment to the Constitution and the desire to protect their property and families.
The American Left can be said to be divided between those who think more gun control of a type would be better for workers and oppressed groups than the status quo, and those who believe it would inevitably be used as part of the oppression.
Duke Aaron of the Redneck Revolt Network (a group of armed workers that fights white supremacy and promotes community defence) says: “Firearms are legislated like the rest of the country is legislated: completely compromised and geared towards control and capital. Gun laws predominately favour people who can afford firearms [Good quality pistols cost $300–$400] and gun control has a long history rooted in the idea that white supremacy needs to keep guns out of the hands of people of colour…” And: “If something happens what are we supposed to do? Call the cops and wait hours for them to turn up and shrug their shoulders or even sometimes shoot us?”
Minnie Bruce Pratt writing in Workers’ World, paper of the Workers’ World Party, said: “…the disproportionate number of deaths of people of colour, people with disabilities and genderqueer people at the hands of police…belies the wisdom of relying on the US state to safeguard our lives” and: “Instead, we can turn to the many examples of mutual help and self-defence.”
Marc Bodine, Chair of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) in Washington State, says that although the CPUSA does not have an official position on gun ownership he believes that most of its members support the Second Amendment and the right to own guns but also “common sense” restrictions to those rights. He thinks that having lots of guns around will not alter the balance of political power, the State will always have more fire power, but he supports the right of people’s movements to defend themselves against armed attacks by the State.