Sunday, June 15, 2025

The cowardly BBC

The British Broadcasting Corporation is one of our supposed “national treasures” whose aims are to educate, inform and entertain the public that funds it through the licence fee. Under the motto “Nation shall speak peace unto Nation” the BBC claims to be a pillar of impartiality and a reliable source of independent news at home and abroad. 
That was never the case back in the 1920s when the Corporation was founded. It’s certainly not the case now.
The BBC’s role has always been to serve the ruling class and defend British imperialism. During the Second World War the BBC’s policy of credible reporting easily outshone that of the Nazis. When the war ended the BBC continued to serve the ruling class and defend British imperialism. It totally failed to report a famine in Bengal that resulted in around 10 million deaths and was the result of a deliberate British imperialist policy of deprivation, and defended colonial efforts to maintain the Empire throughout the post-war era. 
During the Cold War the Beeb cashed in on its war-time prestige to churn out sophisticated anti-communist propaganda at home and all around the world in the service of Anglo-American imperialism. It was said that while news from the Voice of America and Radio Moscow were “95 per cent truth and five per cent lies” the BBC had the edge with “ninety-eight per cent truth and only two per cent lies”.
Those days are now long gone. Although the state-owned broadcasting service still promotes some serious dramas, its news and current affairs output is just cheap, dumbed-down, third-rate bourgeois propaganda.
The BBC consistently supported Nato aggression against Serbia, Iraq and Libya, and imperialist efforts for regime-change in Syria and Venezuela, whilst turning a blind eye to Ukrainian fascist war-crimes in the Donbas and routine Zionist atrocities against the Palestinians. Obscure Russian, Chinese and Korean dissidents are treated like latter-day Gandhis while communists and other left leaders in the Global South are vilified or simply ignored. 
This is the BBC that led the pack that demonised Jeremy Corbyn when he was the leader of the Labour Party. This is an international news outlet that crackdowns on their own journalists for sharing posts that include facts about Israeli atrocities in Gaza. This is the broadcaster that totally ignored the massive Palestine solidarity demonstration that rocked London last weekend. Some 600,000 people marched through the heart of the capital in support of the heroic Palestinians who still refuse to budge in the face of Israeli terror. But you wouldn’t know about it if you only relied on the BBC for home news.
Meanwhile this august body, which turned a blind eye to all sorts of degenerates like the late Jimmy Saville, can force out Gary Lineker for daring to publicly denounce the Zionist genocide in the Gaza Strip.
Lineker was a legend on the pitch. A top scorer in the League he made his England debut in 1984, earning 80 caps and scoring 48 goals over an eight-year international career, which made him England's second-highest goal-scorer on his retirement. Now he’s an immensely popular sports broadcaster. It’s the Beeb’s loss and Lineker’s gain. He’ll soon be back amongst the highest echelons of the sports media. As for the BBC no-one will miss it. The sooner it goes the better...


Back from the brink

Pakistani, Indian and Bangladeshi communists all called for restraint following clashes over Kashmir that, once again, took India and Pakistan to the brink of all-out war. The latest round of fighting was triggered by the sectarian killing of Hindu tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir. The Indian government blame the Kashmiri Resistance Front, which they say is a front for Pakistani intelligence. The Resistance Front vehemently denies any involvement in the deadly attack. They say it was an Indian “false-flag” provocation designed to provide a pretext for more Indian aggression and they’re calling for an independent investigation into the massacre.
Pakistan called for an independent investigation into the massacre which was rejected by the Indians who instead launched coordinated airstrikes and artillery attacks on what they called the “terrorist infrastructure” across the cease-fire line that has divided Kashmir since 1949. Pakistan responded by downing five Indian war-planes and a surveillance drone. Fortunately both nuclear powers have pulled back from further action that could have spelt disaster for millions of people in Pakistan and India. But a cease-fire isn’t going to end the Kashmir crisis that has led to  four all-out wars with Pakistan since independence. 
The crisis goes back to the shambles of the partition of the British Raj in 1947. Faced with the overwhelming demand of the Indian masses for independence after the Second World War Britain had no choice but to bring down the curtain on direct colonial rule and that of the feudal Indian kings who ruled the “princely states” of the Indian Empire.  
But the British ruling class believed that sectarian divisions would preserve their interests after independence.  Millions upon millions died in communal rioting, partition, the establishment of the supposedly secular Indian Union and the Muslim state of Pakistan (which then included Bangladesh) and the first Indo-Pakistan war that followed.
Kashmir's decision to join the Indian Union was made by their feudal prince without consultation with the people – a fact recognised by one of the first decisions of the United Nations, which agreed on a referendum to allow the population to vote on whether they wanted to join India, Pakistan or establish their own independent state.
India is led by a reactionary high-caste party that relies on the support of anti-Muslim Hindu movements to keep them in office. The decision of the Modi government to abolish the Indian-Kashmiris right to their own constitution and parliament fulfils the long-term objective of the Hindu supremacists who want to end all pretence of secularism in the Republic of India.
A cease-fire line divides Kashmir – one-third under Pakistani control while India administers the rest. The vast majority of the population are Muslims with close ties to Pakistan. There can be no doubt that any popular vote would lead either to union with Pakistan or independence. The Indians have never accepted this and now they think Pakistan is too weak to stop them annexing Eastern Kashmir outright.
Pakistan and India are both nuclear powers and another full-scale war could easily escalate into a nuclear exchange that would leave millions dead. We must support all efforts to ensure that this does not happen.
But the key demand must be the end of partition. We must uphold the original UN resolution and support the just demand for a referendum to let the Kashmiri people decide if they want to be part of India, Pakistan, or in an independent state of Kashmir.

A symbol of China’s Dulong people in London

by New Worker correspondent

David Francis and the blanket
A traditional Dulong blanket from China's least populous ethnic minority made its debut at the opening of the China National Pavilion during the 2025 London Craft Week which ran until 18th May. The China Pavilion is themed "Tian Gong Kai Wu" after a renowned 17th-century Chinese encyclopedia widely regarded as the world's first systematic record of Chinese craftsmanship and agricultural knowledge. 
The Dulong primarily reside in Nujiang Lisu Autonomous Prefecture in south-west China. The Dulong blanket, woven by Dulong women, is a cultural symbol of their community.
The Dulong display was supported by the Mothers' Needlework initiative, launched by the China Ping An Group and the Art and Design Press. The programme aims to promote women's employment and alleviate poverty.
At the opening Zhao Fei, from the Chinese embassy, highlighted the shared heritage of craftsmanship in both China and Britain. He noted that both countries have splendid craft traditions, and expressed hope that this year's London Craft Week would deepen mutual understanding and friendship between the two nations.
Qian Zhu, president and editor-in-chief of Art and Design magazine, said that Dulong blankets and its related textiles generate annual sales of approximately 500,000 yuan (£51,600) in the UK. For an ethnic group with a population of just 7,000, the growing domestic and international recognition of Dulong textiles is a significant achievement.
David Francis, a lecturer in Curating Asian Art at SOAS, University of London, whose research includes ethnic minority communities in China said he was excited to see textiles he had encountered in China now being exhibited in London. He emphasised the importance of integrating traditional craft with contemporary design to resonate with modern audiences.

Friday, May 23, 2025

Stop the genocide against the Palestinian people


Joint Statement of Communist and Workers’ Parties
 
The Communist and Workers’ Parties condemn the new crime against the Palestinian people, which is being carried out before the eyes of the whole world and has been brought about by the intensification of the barbaric military aggression and the criminal Israeli blockade on the Gaza Strip.
The genocide that Israel is committing in the Gaza Strip, with thousands of dead civilians, children and elderly people, with millions of people deprived of food, water, electricity and medical supplies, with the complete destruction of hospitals and with millions of people displaced, is supported by the USA, NATO, the EU and all those bourgeois regimes that support Israel or keep silent about this inhuman crime.
We express our full solidarity with the Palestinian people and defend their right to a free homeland, to be masters in their own land. We condemn the decades-long Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories, the killings, imprisonment, persecution and settlements.
We demand an end to the Israeli occupation, the creation and recognition of an independent Palestinian state, the cessation and dismantling of the illegal settlements in the Palestinian territories, the release of prisoners from Israeli jails and the return of refugees in accordance with UN Resolution 194.
We salute the massive internationalist solidarity with the Palestinian people that has been expressed in many countries and we call on the workers, the peoples and the youth in all countries tointensify the struggle to stop the massacre in the Gaza, to end the Israeli occupation of Palestine and to express their solidarity with the just struggle of the Palestinian people in a decisive way.

Everyone on the path of struggle!
Freedom for Palestine!
 
SolidNet Parties
    1. Algerian Party for Democracy and Socialism  (PADS)
    2. Communist Party of Australia
    3. Party of Labour of Austria
    4. Communist Party of Bangladesh
    5. Brazilian Communist Party
    6. Communist Party of Britain
    7. New Communist Party of Britain
    8. Communist Party of Canada
    9. Socialist Workers' Party of Croatia
    10. Communist Party of Denmark
    11. Communist Party of El Salvador
    12. German Communist Party
    13. Communist Party of Greece
    14. Communist Party of India (Marxist)
    15. Iraqi Communist Party
    16. Communist Party of Kurdistan-Iraq
    17. Tudeh Party of Iran
    18. Workers Party of Ireland
    19. Communist Party of Israel
    20. Socialist Movement of Kazakhstan
    21. Lebanese Communist Party
    22. Communist Party of Mexico
    23. New Communist Party of the Netherlands
    24. Communist Party of Pakistan
    25. Palestinian Peoples Party
    26. Palestinian Communist Party
    27. Philippine Communist Party [PKP 1930]
    28. Romanian Socialist Party
    29. Communists of Serbia
    30. Communist Party of the Workers of Spain
    31. Communists of Catalonia
    32. Sudanese Communist Party
    33. Communist Party of Sweden
    34. Communist Party (Switzerland)
    35. Swiss Communist Party
    36. Syrian Communist Party
    37. Communist Party of Turkey
    38. Communist Party of Ukraine
    39. Union of Communists of Ukraine
    40. CPUSA
    41. Communist Party of Venezuela

     

 
Other Parties
  • Argentinian Communist Party
  • Revolutionary Brazilian Communist Party
  • Communist Workers' Party – For Peace and Socialism (Finland)
  • Revolutionary Communist Party - Communists (France)
  • Communist Revolutionary Party of France (PCRF)
  • Communist Front (Italy)
  • Communist Workers' Platform USA (CWPUSA)

Thursday, May 22, 2025

The Nazi revival and the threat of war

by Theo Russell
the forum begins

The Second International Anti-Fascist Forum which took place last month in Moscow was a very timely gathering of the best elements of the world’s communist and workers parties.
To be at this event it wasn’t enough simply to be aware of the resurgence of the far right and fascism in the advanced capitalist countries; in practice the parties present had to have good relations with the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF), the Forum organisers, and also be prepared to attend an event in Moscow. This in turn means a correct analysis of the war in Ukraine since February 2014 and of the Russian Special Military Operation (SMO) which began in February 2022.
Like the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 1939 and the Soviet-Finnish war of 1939-40, a correct Marxist Leninist assessment of the Russian intervention in Ukraine requires a sufficient knowledge of the events leading up to it and the overall strategy of Western imperialism in the world today.
Unfortunately, some of the world’s largest communist parties have, in fact, failed this test. Led by the French communists and the Communist Party of Greece (KKE), many parties declared the SMO an ‘imperialist’ operation.
This was an abject failure to understand how the Nato alliance had deliberately created a situation which effectively forced Russia to act. 
First, by 2022 fascist and specifically anti-Russian Banderite thinking had spread throughout Ukraine including the armed forces and police. Ukraine had become a living example of a 1930s-style fascist state, and in practice only an external military intervention could eradicate the resulting dictatorship.
Second, this dictatorship unleashed horrific atrocities and caused the deaths of tens of thousands of people, especially in the Russian-speaking regions, long before February 2022.
Third, Nato blatantly used the Minsk peace talks to pump weapons into Ukraine and train an entirely new ‘Nato standard’ military, all the while falsely claiming that the Donbas forces and Russia were breaking the agreed ceasefires. When it became clear that the placing of long-range missiles in Ukraine was the next step, the puppet regime became a mortal threat to Russia. In other words, Nato’s plan all along was to force the Russian Federation into a war.
Thus, a Marxist-Leninist analysis shows the current war in Ukraine is not between Russia and Ukraine. It is a war directed against Russia, and backed by 55 Nato and allied states.
From a Marxist-Leninist position, the Russian intervention, and the war fought before that by the Donbas People’s Republics, is a just war. It is in fact a war of liberation from the tyranny of a fascist dictatorship.
For these reasons, the Moscow Forum was an opportunity for the best elements of the world communist movement to gather and prepare tactics for the inevitable future clashes with the rising fascist tide and the threat of new wars – the products of the deepening capitalist crisis.
Leading members of the CPRF themselves made major theoretical contributions to the Forum, including general secretary Gennady Zyuganov as well as Dmitry Novikov and Yuri Afonin from the Central Committee.
During the Forum discussion on Nazism and Fascism as a Natural Continuation of Colonial Capitalism, Afonin described how fascism first arose as capitalism's reaction to the Great October Socialist Revolution, which he said “resulted in a colossal strengthening of the communist and labour movement across the planet. Capitalism found itself on the brink of historical collapse. Its response was fascism”.
He argued that the bourgeoisie of the richest capitalist countries such as the USA, Britain, France and the Netherlands, were able to maintain their rule without abandoning bourgeois democracy, due to the enormous financial resources available to them. “But in the poorer countries of the semi-periphery, the capitalists began to solve this problem with the help of fascism” – a reference to Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal.
“After 1945” he continued “fascist practice and fascist regimes became the lot of the periphery of the world capitalist system. The Western imperialist powers in suppressing national liberation movements in the colonies was practically no different from the practice of mass terror that Hitler's Reich conducted in the occupied territories”. 
Afonin said the Western powers established a kind of "export" of fascism to the countries of the Third World, now known as the Global South. “In the Third World they contributed to the establishment of fascist regimes dozens of times, and supported them for decades”.
He described the ‘special structures’ which were created, such as the USA’s ‘School of the Americas’ created in 1946 to train military and police officers from Latin American countries in large numbers. “Graduates of this ‘school’ took part in many coups d'état, after which fascist regimes were established” with the creation of  “death squads, mass kidnappings, torture and murder”.
“In 1965-66, during the establishment of the fascist regime in Indonesia, according to various estimates, between one and two million people were exterminated. And in Guatemala, the fascist regime, supported by the United States, exterminated about 10 per cent of the country's Indian population in the 1980s, with Indian villages being destroyed along with all their inhabitants and burned.
Afonin paid tribute to Cuba’s outstanding role in the fight against fascism in the second half of the 20th century. “Cuba gave every possible support to Latin American liberation movements that fought against fascist regimes. And this was one of the reasons why Latin American fascist dictators were eventually either overthrown by rebels or forced to resign and give way to democratic governments. 
“And in Africa, Cuban internationalist warriors helped the peoples of Angola and Mozambique defend their independence in the face of aggression from the racists of South Africa, whose regime pursued a truly fascist policy towards black Africans”.
“In the modern world”, Afonin continued, “fascism is a form of neo-colonialism used by Western imperialism. The closest example to us geographically is Ukraine. After the collapse of the USSR, it effectively fell into neo-colonial dependence on the West.
“Today, the form of this Western domination is the Zelensky regime, which meets all the signs of a fascist one. Now this regime is busy preparing to transfer all the natural resources and all the most profitable assets of its country to the United States. It is difficult to find a more obvious example of outright neocolonialism”.
He then turned to the Middle East. “Here the State of Israel is pursuing a policy towards the Palestinian people that is confusingly similar to the policy of Hitler's Reich towards the peoples it declared ‘inferior’.
“It is also worth taking a closer look at armed radical Islamism. These groups usually say they want to return society to the times of the first caliphs. But we understand that this is impossible. It is impossible to revive the social order that existed almost one and a half thousand years ago. 
“Behind this reactionary utopia lies a completely different reality. We must not forget that radical Islamism in its current form was created by Western intelligence services in the 1980s to use against Soviet troops in Afghanistan. And now we see signs that Western imperialism is using radical Islamism against its opponents. 
“The economy of ISIS territories continued to be integrated into the system of global capitalism. Oil extracted in ISIS territories somehow ended up in Western tankers, which transported it around the world. In the territories where radical Islamists established their power, polygamy, marriages with little girls and slavery were legalised. Ancient cultural monuments were barbarously destroyed and mass terror was unleashed”.
Dmitry Novikov, Deputy Chair of the CPRF Central Committee spoke at the section "Lenin's teaching on imperialism and fascism". He emphasised the new aggressive approach of the collective West in the form of the war against Russia unleashed by the hands of Ukrainian neo-Nazis, adding other examples such as Israel's bombing of Palestine, the use of Taiwan in the fight against People’s China, and the new American trade war. He warned of the danger of economic conflicts escalating into military ones. 
He recalled that the capitalist crisis after 1918 led to a powerful struggle by the labour movement. In Italy Mussolini banned strikes and reduced workers' wages, while the ‘democratic’ countries supported the regime. In Germany the Nazi party was “turned into a fist of the bourgeoisie to strike blows at the communists and the labour movement”, while American and British monopolies helped the Third Reich to rebuild military production.
Today, he said “Nato has put the supply of various types of weapons to the Ukrainian neo-Nazi regime on stream. Thus, the imperialists play a key role in the formation of fascist regimes”.
Novikov pointed out that “Lenin was the first and most outstanding anti-fascist. He saw the threat of fascism back in the early 1920s and warned the European workers about it. He revealed the essence of imperialism, which is the progenitor of fascism.
“Vladimir Lenin created a party that, under the leadership of Joseph Stalin, became the grave-digger of fascism and created the Comintern, whose parties took up the first battle against the brown plague”.
He recalled that after the Soviet victory over the Third Reich, many Nazis went on to serve in government structures and intelligence services of the ‘democratic’ countries, while the West supported the power of the colonels in Greece, the Pinochet junta in Chile, and other reactionary regimes.
Novikov spoke of the latest ‘innovations’ of global capital, such as using global social networks to suppress dissent (what the Cuban Communist Party calls “digital colonialism”). “In the US and Europe, people who criticise the policies of the ruling circles are subjected to moral terror by the authorities, fired from work, and banned from professions and publication in the media”.
“At present world capitalism is reviving Nazism. The threat of a new world war is growing. In these conditions, the duty of progressive forces, honest people, is to consolidate in the fight against dangerous tendencies.”
Novikov referred to the fascist tactic of “playing on the social moods of the people, to exploit the workers' desire for justice, their rejection of corruption, and the dictates of capitalist monopolies. As a result, many workers become victims of Nazi demagogy”. 
Viktor Tyulkin, leader of the Russian Communist Workers' Party, declared his party’s support for the special operation in Ukraine.
He described the collective West, led by the United States, as “the most predatory imperialist force in the world. To achieve its goal of world hegemony, the Western imperialists are striving to dismember Russia. All this began not in 2022, but in 1991,” he said 
“We should not remain silent about Nato approaching the borders of our country, about the imperialists cultivating Banderites in Ukraine. Repeating the fate of Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya in Russia is contrary to the interests of the working class of our country and the whole world”.
Tyulkin also mentioned the responsibility of the Russian ruling class, since the roots of the current situation lie in the liquidation of socialism. “The abolition of Soviet power put Russia in a vulnerable position, and the unleashing of anti-communism continues to this day. Only under socialism will it be possible to completely eliminate the threat of fascism”.
Tyulkin also spoke of “a campaign in our country to rename settlements, squares, streets, and to glorify reactionaries, including fascist philosophers.”
Many other speakers condemned the US and Nato for the Ukrainian Nazi regime, Israeli aggression against Palestine, and American pressure on China and Cuba, and said it was unacceptable for countries which took an independent position to be branded "sponsors of terrorism" and "enemies of democracy".
The representative of the People's Socialist Party of Mexico declared that socialist and genuinely democratic forces should create a World Anti-Fascist Front. 
I N Makarov, of the Russian Scientists for Socialism movement, spoke of the struggle against bourgeois counter-revolution in Russia in the 1990s, and “the unleashing of fascist terror in Russia” in October 1993. “After tanks fired on the House of Soviets” he said, “the Yeltsinites killed hundreds of protesters defending the USSR Constitution at the Krasnaya Presnya stadium and the Ostankino TV Tower”. 
Makarov referred to the work of Gennady Zyuganov, Russia under the Gun of Globalism, which he said “asserts that the phenomenon called ‘globalism’ is simply a new form of imperialism, but has not changed its essence in the slightest. Consequently, Lenin's definition of imperialism remains relevant.”
He said that today “Russia has the mission of defeating fascism for the second time in the past 80 years. He predicted that “if the USSR's victory over Hitlerism in 1945 was followed by the collapse of colonialism, then the current defeat of Banderism will serve as a prologue to the fall of the imperialist system”.
Speakers in the section Fascism – a threat to security and cooperation in Europe spoke of the resurgence of fascism in Europe today, arguing that the European Union has, to some extent, become “the forerunner of the Fourth Reich” in which the renewed fascist movements actively use the difficult situation that has often developed in the sphere of migration policy in different countries. 
Many speakers expressed alarm over the ongoing distortion of historical truth and called for a complete rejection of all forms of decommunisation in state ideology and policy.
Emilio Lasada Garcia, head of the International Department of the Communist Party of Cuba, said “fascism in Latin America has not gone away. With its subversive actions against Venezuela, Washington today seeks to establish a fascist regime in this country, betting on the ultra-right, fascist forces.
“In the United States itself, very disturbing processes are also underway. The slogan ‘Make America Great Again’ is reminiscent of the fascist slogans of the past. In today's USA, concentration camps have been revived, where many thousands of migrants are thrown.”
Marcelo Rodriguez of the Communist Party of Argentina, said that the right-wing Argentine president Miley’s ideology –  “anti-communism, racism, and open hatred of the indigenous Indian peoples actually make it neo-fascist”.
Delegates from several Middle Eastern parties said the Zionist regime is pursuing a fascist policy of genocide and ethnic cleansing in the Gaza Strip, where every thirtieth resident of the Gaza Strip has already been killed and 20 per cent of residents have been expelled from their homes, most of which have simply been destroyed.
Benedict Martins of the South African Communist Party noted that the armed struggle in the Donbas did not begin in 2022, but eight years earlier. And the root of this conflict is that neo-fascism has once again raised its ugly head in Ukraine in the form of an openly Nazi Bandera ideology.
This view was echoed by Konstantina Kartsioti, a Greek communist in the Anti Imperialist Front, who said the huge Western imperialist propaganda machine was now spreading lies about Russia around the world, but that thanks to the activities of progressive forces, more and more people are beginning to understand the essence and roots of the conflict in Ukraine.

Monday, May 12, 2025

The struggle against fascism is the common and urgent task of the progressive forces all over the world

Appeal of the Second International Anti-Fascist Forum

We, the participants in the Second Anti-Fascist Forum in Moscow, reaffirm and support the Manifesto for the uniting of the world’s peoples “Safeguard Humanity Against  Fascism” adopted on April 22 2023 in Minsk by the I International Anti-Fascist Forum.
The course of events has indicated the proposition that the cause of imperialist aggressiveness in the modern world is the aggravation of the general crisis of capitalism. At the end of the 20th century the counter-revolution in the USSR and in the countries of Eastern Europe temporarily weakened the planet’s socialist pole and untied the hands of reaction. Fully in accordance with the Leninist theory of imperialism, the USA and the other capitalist predators are making a bid for world hegemony by the most heinous of methods, including the fostering of neo-Fascist regimes.
In accordance with the Fascist ideology of enslavement of the peoples the imperialist regimes have stained their reputations by barbaric aggressions against Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, supported the Israeli Zionists who have unleashed the slaughter in Palestine which has practically developed into a genocide of the Palestinian people.
Threatening a new world war, international imperialism is stoking up tensions in various regions of the world and igniting new conflicts.
NATO countries  set the task of demonizing Russia, defeating it militarily and dismembering it in the same fashion as the Soviet Union. To achieve this goal an aggressive bridgehead was being created in Ukraine.  Banderovism, a form of Nazism which has formed the basis of Russophobia and the spread of Fascist ideology, was being nurtured there. By February of 2022 the US-led anti-Russian policy of the NATO military involved nearly 50 satellite countries. The economic, political and military resources of the world capital, including war mercenaries, were committed to the attack against Russia. Further strengthening of the Neo-Nazi regime in Kiev and pumping it full of weapons must be prevented. The Bandera thugs and their principals in the West must be justly condemned and the Fascist regime in Kiev must be fully liquidated.
Revanchist motives are increasingly evident in the ideology and policy of the Western bloc. They are being instigated by the same forces which suffered a defeat at the hands of the Soviet Union and its Red Army in 1945. Anti-communism is one of the main signs of the resurgence of Fascism in Ukraine, the Baltics and other Western countries. This is totally in line with the practice of Hitler’s Fascists who created an Anti-Comintern Pact. Everything that is happening in the European Union is essentially a prelude to the creation of the Fourth Reich.
The peoples of the world must stem any attempts of a Nazi revenge. We demand total renunciaton of all forms of de-communisation in state ideology and policies. The struggle against neo-Nazism is the task of all the thinking, courageous and decent people of the planet. It cannot be put off until later. It must be waged here and now by all available means and by bringing together all possible allies!
On the eve of the 80th anniversary of the Great Victory over Hitler’s Nazism and Japanese militarism in the Second World War we declare: a final end to Fascism and the threat of world wars can be put only by putting an end to imperialism. We support without reservations the transformation of the struggle against Fascism into the struggle for the socialist renewal of all the countries on the planet.

The battle against Fascism cannot tolerate pauses and armistices!
Join the ranks of the fighters against Neo-Fascism, for social progress and socialism!
We will not allow the world to be blown up!
¡No pasarán! They shall not pass!
Long live the united front of the progressive forces!

Moscow
23 April 2025

Sunday, May 11, 2025

Victory Day 2025

 This year marks the 80th anniversary of  the end of the Second World War. The war, which cost over 61 million lives, began with the Nazi German invasion of Poland on 1st September 1939 and ended on 2nd September 1945 when the Japanese Emperor Hirohito surrendered following the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by American atom bombs. 
Announcing the news of the German surrender on 8th May 1945 the old king, George VI, said “We shall have failed, and the blood of our dearest will have flowed in vain, if the victory which they died to win does not lead to a lasting peace, founded on justice and established in good will. To that, then, let us turn our thoughts on this day of just triumph and proud sorrow; and then take up our work again, resolved as a people to do nothing unworthy of those who died for us and to make the world such a world as they would have desired, for their children and for ours”. That world, sadly, has not happened.
It would be quite impossible, of course, to write all that should be said about the Second World War. But there are three key points that must never be forgotten.
The first is the imperialist nature of the conflict which was launched by German finance capital which saw territorial expansion as necessary to break free of the constraints placed on Germany after the first world war.
The second is the impact of fascist ideas which led to the most barbarous treatment of many people, especially Jews and other minorities, under the Nazi heel. Slave labour and super exploitation soon became murder by brutality and starvation and ultimately it became mass slaughter in the gas chambers of the Nazi death camps.
The third aspect was the war against the USSR. This was more than an attack against a state, it was a direct attack on socialism. The Nazis even used this fact to try and lure other capitalist leaderships to support its anti-communist crusade against the Soviet Union.
Donald Trump can, perhaps, be forgiven for believing the Hollywood myth that the Americans, almost single-handedly, won the war. To be fair, he did acknowledge that Russia “lost millions of people, and that was absolutely an important factor” while nevertheless adding that there was “no factor as important as us”. 
 Still that’s more than some European politicians would say these days as the Soviet role in the victory is air-brushed out of history by those who choose to forget those who made the greatest sacrifice in the struggle against Nazi Germany. 
Winston Churchill said that the RAF’s battle with the Luftwaffe in 1940 was the “finest hour” in what would later be called the Battle of Britain. It certainly was, but the finest hour for the world communist movement was undoubtedly the Battle for Europe.
The Soviet people, led by Joseph Stalin and the Bolsheviks, liberated half of Europe and smashed Nazi Germany while Josef Broz Tito’s guerrilla army and Enver Hoxha’s partisans drove the fascists out of the Balkans. Communist-led resistance forces had the fascists on the run in Greece, France and Italy while Mao Zedong, Kim Il Sung and Ho Chi Minh led the fight for freedom against the Empire of Japan.
If it wasn’t for the communists Germany and Japan would have won the war. What that would have meant can easily be seen by their actions during the conflict – the extermination of millions of Jews and others deemed unfit to live by the Nazis; concentration camps, mass slavery and dictatorial rule by industrialists, landowners, war-lords and degenerates of every kind. This was the world ruled by Hitler and Hirohito – a world that would have set back civilisation hundreds of years had it succeeded.
The Soviet Union is now sadly no more but nothing can take away its achievements. The Soviet victory will be remembered by working people for ever.

The first civilisation

 by Ben Soton

Between Two Rivers a History of Mesopotamia and the birth of History by Moudhy Al-Rashid. Hardback 336 pp, Hachette, London 2025 Hbk £25, Pbk £12.99

When we look at history, we tend to view things in terms of BC or AD; or before or after the birth of Christ.  Sometimes we need reminding that there is more recorded history covering the years before the birth of Jesus of Nazareth than since.  To put this in perspective we are closer chronologically to the Roman conquest of Britain than Julius Caesar was to the earliest historical records. What we refer to as the “historical era” originated in Mesopotamia, the land between and around the Tigris and Euphrates rivers somewhere around the fourth millennia BC.  
It is to this period in ancient Mesopotamia that Moudhy Al-Rashid devotes her debut book Between Two Rivers a History of Mesopotamia and the birth of History.  The basis of her study is a discovery of a range of primary artefacts in 1920 which include; a clay drum, a mace head, a statue, school tablets, a brick and a cone. The author uses her in-depth knowledge combined with the study of the items to construct a period of what was probably the world’s first civilisation.
Much of the work is based on a study of cuneiform, probably the world’s first form of writing.  Cuneiform was used by the Sumerian. Akkadian, Assyrian and Babylonian empires.  Al-Rashid points out that writing was not invented by poets, authors, playwrights or even journalists. It was simply a means of recording grain transactions, inventories and rations.  In other words, without the need for bureaucrats to keep records there would be no Dickens, Shakespeare or for the that matter the New Worker. It is from these essentially mundane records that “history” emanates.   
What makes Mesopotamia special is that it was the world’s first region to develop agriculture. From agriculture came cities, trade, warfare and most important of all class society.  In early class society payment for work was given out in the form of rations rather than cash and a considerable amount of work was done by slaves. 
Although probably not a Marxist herself, Al-Rashid’s book confirms this view.  She goes on to point out that much of history is told from the point of view of those at the top of society with the rest of us often ignored.  
In her own words the author views the artefacts as a handshake with a long dead person from the past. Her knowledge of the very ancient world and its languages comes through in the book. Her work is well worth reading for anyone interested in the period that even the Romans would have considered as ancient history.          
          

Saturday, May 10, 2025

80th anniversary of the defeat of fascism

 


Red Line TV Moscow Anti-Fascist Forum video with English sub-titles...

Wednesday, May 07, 2025

Bad news on the doorstep…

Reform’s sweeping gains in this week’s regional elections were bad news for the Conservatives. Nigel Farage’s going round saying this is the beginning of the end for the Tories telling people “you’re witnessing the end of a party that’s been around since 1832, they are disappearing”. And while that may be a trifle optimistic there’s no doubt that the Faragist advance has plunged the Conservatives, and their lacklustre leader, into another crisis of confidence. But it wasn’t good for Labour either. Though the Tories were hammered in the local elections Reform also took one of Labour’s  safest seats in the country at the by-election in Runcorn & Helsby. Can any of us be surprised at this?
The Starmer government, led by the clapped-out old Blairites that run the Labour Party these days, differs little from the Conservatives they beat at the general election last year. The Starmer government’s decision to continue Tory austerity offers no real change to the millions of working people that once traditionally looked to Labour as the legitimate alternative to Tory rule. It’s no wonder that some of them are now turning to the Faragists who blame the asylum-seekers and immigrants for all our woes and whose only answer to the economic crisis that has plunged the country into the doldrums is to become an American protectorate and merge the British economy into that of the United States. 
Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, will doubtless come under fire from those who already covet her job. But the clamour for her departure is of no interest to working people who have no say in the matter one way or another.
For over a hundred years the Tory party has been the chosen political instrument of the ruling class. The capitalists, industrialists and land-owners who pull the strings, will not lightly change horses – least of all for Reform whose anti-European Union platform is anathema to the City of London.
Labour, on the other hand, was founded by the unions to give workers their own voice in Parliament. But the Parliamentary Party leadership has been dominated by the middle class intelligentsia since the days of Ramsay McDonald. Nevertheless the working class element within the party remained strong until the 1980s with figures like Nye Bevan and even Harold Wilson giving it credibility among the working class.
Though the Labour Party is dominated by the class‑collaborating right wing in the parliamentary party the possibility of their defeat exists as long as Labour retains its organisational links with the trade unions that fund it. The defeat of the right‑wing factions in most of the major unions in recent years demonstrates this possibility – though it has to be said that the bogus “broad left” factions that run the bureaucrats’ gravy train do very little for the rank and file these days.
In the unions we must struggle to elect genuine working-class leaderships who are prepared to represent and fight for the membership against the employers and against the right-wing within the movement. At the same time we must build the revolutionary party and campaign for revolutionary change. Social democracy remains social democracy whatever trend is dominant within it and, as we know, it has never led to socialism.
But for a start we must campaign for a democratic Labour Party controlled by its affiliates. A Labour Party whose policies reflected those of a democratic union movement would become a powerful instrument for progressive reforms that would strengthen organised labour and benefit the working class.


Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Our May Day...


 On the first day of May we remember those dark days of old when workers fought against grasping employers who would have them work all day, every day but Sunday, for a miserable pittance of a wage. And though the origins of May Day go back to hallowed antiquity when it was a festival for the ancient gods, it has also always been a day for working people. We also remember the pioneers of the labour movement that built the unions in Britain and throughout the rest of the world that curbed the worst excesses of the employers and set up the First International that declared May Day an international working-class holiday in 1889.

...and theirs…

May Day will be marked, as usual, by the labour movement in events up and down the country including the traditional march in central London and a rally in Trafalgar Square. It will also be marked by local elections for 23 councils and six mayors in England.
The Tories are facing a strong challenge, in hundreds of seats they won in 2021, from Nigel Farage’s Reform party. Some say the Faragists will make the greatest gains next week with Labour in second place and the Tories amongst the also-rans. The opinion polls currently put Reform slightly ahead of Labour with the Tories third, followed by the Liberal-Democrats and the Greens. Whether this will be reflected in the real May Day polls is another matter.
In the halcyon days of the 1970s when the unions packed a punch on the street the left focused on union elections and building grass-roots movements to mobilise the labour movement in the fight for the socialist alternative. While these long-gone campaigns were flawed they did, at least, try to involve the rank-and-file in the struggle – unlike the bogus “broad left” factions that run the bureaucrats’ gravy-train in most of our unions today.
We will, doubtless, see the return of the usual left social-democratic platforms in these elections – posing as a serious “alternative” to Labour while incapable of mobilising more than the protest vote that’s effortlessly garnered by the likes of Lord Buckethead or the Monster Raving Loonies.
The mainstream parties have done their best to inject some interest in these polls. But though around a third of the electorate in England will be eligible to vote few of them – a third at the best – will be bothered to go to the polling booths on the day.
There’s a number of reasons behind the lack of interest in local elections on the street. Indifference is bred from the fact that hardly anyone knows the names of their local councillors and the councils they represent have few real powers these days. Nevertheless the results will be closely scrutinised by the media pundits who see these polls, which include a parliamentary by-election in the Cheshire seat of Runcorn & Helsby, as a measure of the Starmer government’s standing following last year’s general election.


Sunday, April 27, 2025

21st Century Fascism: Reflections for Debate

by Wevergton Brito

Wevergton Brito is vice president of the Brazilian Centre for Solidarity with Peoples and the Struggle for Peace (Cebrapaz)

In Latin America, the “Big Lie” technique, amplified by social media, has also caused great damage, and I would like to begin by commenting on some cases that occurred in Brazil. 
During the 2010 presidential campaign, then-candidate Dilma Rousseff was targeted by an underground war on social media. At the time, WhatsApp had only arrived in the country a year earlier and had not yet reached the influence it would later achieve. Even so, Dilma's candidacy was the target of an avalanche of fake news that concretely influenced a significant part of the population to either annul their vote or vote for José Serra, her main opponent, who represented the traditional right. 
My former in-laws, a retired school janitor and a maintenance worker at the same Catholic school, had always voted for Lula since 1989. To my surprise, when I visited them after the first round of the 2010 election, both (devout Catholics) had annulled their votes because they were “informed” that Dilma would force churches to perform same-sex marriages. Other bizarre fabrications that gained traction included: 

• Dilma had cancer, would die soon, and Michel Temer (her running mate) would take over. His son was supposedly a Satanist. 
• Dilma had gonorrhea. 
• She had challenged Jesus Christ himself during a rally in the state of Minas Gerais. 
• She would shut down churches and imprison priests and pastors. 

The mainstream media remained silent in the face of this abject underground smear campaign because the beneficiary was their preferred candidate who, despite all of this, was still defeated in the second round. 
In 2011, a request was made to revoke the mandate of then-federal deputy Jair Bolsonaro after he made various racist and misogynistic statements against singer and TV host Preta Gil. The most influential political columnist for the major bourgeois newspaper O Globo, Ricardo Noblat, defended the fascist. Shamelessly, Noblat concealed the real accusations and claimed that Bolsonaro was at risk of losing his mandate merely for expressing controversial opinions, such as being “against racial quotas, the anti-homophobia bill, civil unions for homosexuals, and adoption by same sex couples”. Noblat accused those who denounced Bolsonaro of being “good fascists”. 
On 12th February 2014 José Gullén Araque, a captain in the Venezuelan National Guard, gave President Nicolás Maduro a book on the rise of Nazism, declaring at the time “fascism must be defeated before it is too late”. Just over a month later, Araque was assassinated with a shot to the head by Venezuelan fascist groups led by a well-known far-right extremist named Leopoldo López, whose actions resulted in the deaths of 43 people. 
However, Aécio Neves (the traditional right-wing candidate against Dilma Rousseff in 2014) visited the criminal in prison. The corporate media, both in Venezuela and Brazil, referred to Leopoldo López as a “political prisoner”. 
During the massive rallies calling for President Dilma’s “impeachment” heavily promoted by the mainstream media in 2015 and 2016, far-right sound trucks were always present, advocating for a military coup and praising torture. Protesters wore T-shirts calling Dilma a “whore” and carried signs suggesting that she “go to Cuba to cure her cancer” among 
other vile insults. None of this seemed to bother the traditional right or the corporate media at the time, which instead praised the supposedly democratic and peaceful nature of the coup-supporting marches. 
The traditional right and mainstream media's tacit encouragement of the openly criminal methods used by their far-right allies had severe consequences: first, it normalised fascism, and by normalising it, it lent credibility to its discourse. 
The fascist far-right became a relevant actor in Latin American political struggles, infiltrating the state’s police and judicial apparatus, promoting class hatred, defamation, sabotage, coups, and coup attempts. It did not always lead these efforts, but it consistently gained visibility and accumulated political and ideological power. 
In 2014 federal police officer Danilo Mascarenhas posted an image of a caricature of President Dilma riddled with bullets. He was "punished" with a four-day suspension. 
Below is a small and incomplete list of coups and coup attempts in Latin America where fascist elements played a prominent role:
 
• 2002 in Venezuela – Chávez was kidnapped, and a coup government was briefly installed. The masses mobilized, and the coup was defeated. 
• 2008 in Bolivia – Opposition groups, led by regional governors in the Media Luna region, blocked roads, occupied state buildings, sabotaged a major gas pipeline, and organised referendums to declare regional independence. Peasants were murdered. 
• 2009 in Honduras – Honduran President Manuel Zelaya, who had joined the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA) the previous year, had the presidential palace invaded by the military. Zelaya was kidnapped and flown to Costa Rica. 
• 2010 in Ecuador – President Rafael Correa went to a police barracks to negotiate with striking officers. The police attacked his entourage, and Correa, injured, was taken to the Military Hospital, which was then surrounded by officers who even opened fire. The confrontation left two presidential guards, two striking police officers, and a pro-government student dead. 
• 2012 in Paraguay – Following “spontaneous” protest demonstrations, the Senate removed elected President Fernando Lugo in a process that lasted only 24 hours. 
• 2013/2014 in Venezuela – “Guarimbas” (armed gangs funded and organised by the far right) carried out attacks on public buildings, leftist parties, and police forces, causing dozens of deaths. 
• 2016 in Brazil – A coup d'état involving the hegemonic media, sectors of the judiciary, and parliament removed President Dilma Rousseff through a fraudulent impeachment process. 
• 2017 in Ecuador – Rafael Correa was forced to flee the country to escape lawfare. His vice president, Jorge Glas, remains imprisoned at the time this article is written. While in prison, Glas attempted suicide, and Correa remains in exile. 
• 2018 in Brazil – Lula, a victim of absurd judicial arbitrariness, was unjustly imprisoned and, during that year's presidential campaign, was even prevented by the courts from speaking about the elections, paving the way for the election of the fascist Jair Bolsonaro. 
• 2019 in Venezuela – The far-right coup plotter Juan Guaidó proclaimed himself the Venezuelan president. The USA and the European Union recognized him as such. Billions of dollars, gold, and state-owned Venezuelan companies were expropriated by imperialist 
or imperialism-subservient governments. 
• 2019 in Venezuela – Under the pretext of "humanitarian aid," a new coup attempt in Venezuela was orchestrated, driven by the USA and countries from the now-defunct "Lima Group." Once again, the coup was defeated. 
• 2019 in Bolivia – A coup in Bolivia forced the newly re-elected President Evo Morales to flee the country. Far-right gangs carried out assassinations and beatings. 

Since our topic is 21st-century fascism, we cannot fail to mention the coup in Ukraine in 2014, which, with the support of the USA and the European Union, brought to power a coalition of openly fascist and neo-Nazi groups. 
The new Ukrainian state power granted the title of national hero to Nazi collaborator Stepan Bandera who, during the German occupation of Ukraine in the Second World War, served in Hitler's ranks, sending communist, Jewish, and antifascist resistance compatriots to concentration camps. 
The alliance between most of the centre, traditional right-wing, and commercial media with the far-right occurs in different ways. In some cases (such as Ukraine, Venezuela, and Bolivia), the far-right explicitly takes the lead in actions. In others, like Brazil until 2018, the centre and the traditional right remain in command but instrumentalise the far-right for all kinds of dirty work. When this happens, the traditional right, while publicly trying to distance itself from the most revealing fascist actions, in practice shields and supports its allies, hoping that, in the end, they will isolate the most dangerous elements and maintain hegemony. 
It is necessary to open a parenthesis here to emphasise that mistakes and shortcomings of the progressive camp facilitated the rise of the conservative and far-right wave. Regarding Latin America's progressive experiences, there is already a vast accumulation of discussion on this, but addressing this subject could divert focus from the main theme of the  article. Therefore, I will only mention two aspects among many: 

    • The illusion regarding the class nature of bourgeois society led to the belief that top-down arrangements could mitigate contradictions and conflicts, resulting in the secondary importance or even abandonment of grassroots work. 
    • We live in a historical era where the failure of collective transformation projects is propagated. Even within the left, space has been opened to weaken this notion, with individual projects often prevailing over collective ones. When this happens, it is no longer about the struggle for transformation but simply the defence of parliamentary careers or positions within the state apparatus. This miseducates the population  about the difference between leftist and rightist practices, contributing to disenchantment, depoliticisation, and the demobilisation of activists who wish to dream again of a "dream dreamed together" as Yoko Ono and Brasilian singer Raul Seixas once put it.  
 
The Rise of Fascism 

It was, indeed, a long gestation. The use of fascist ideas and practices as a political weapon by the bourgeoisie for over seven decades; the lack of viable political perspectives that offered profound solutions as an alternative to a politically and economically bankrupt system; the naturalisation and legitimisation of fascist discourse by the bourgeoisie; the 
worsening of capitalism's economic crisis since 2008; and the increasing aggressiveness of imperialism in response to the emergence of a multipolar world – all these factors created the perfect environment for Brecht’s "pregnant bitch", that I referred in the first part of this series, to finally give birth. 
In the USA, the leading imperialist power, speeches filled with the most primitive anti-communism, rooted in chauvinism, religious fundamentalism, and science denial, have been growing alongside the political discrediting of the American plutocracy and the rapid deterioration of the living conditions of large masses of US workers, who are similarly disillusioned and without advanced prospects. The inauguration of Donald Trump for his second term marks a high point in the rise of the global far right. 
Here, calling Trump crazy or a buffoon does not help at all. The same was said about Hitler and Mussolini. He must be taken seriously. Trump is advancing decisively and rapidly in destroying what little remains democratic in the American plutocracy, moving toward a de facto dictatorship, which, if successful, will be followed by a radicalisation of his counterparts worldwide. 
Trump’s lebensraum manifests itself with immense brazenness. On what legal basis, under international or humanitarian law, does Trump propose to simply expel the Palestinians and turn Gaza into a macabre American real estate venture built over the corpses of thousands of men, women, and children? None. He doesn’t even care. 
Just as Italian and German fascism discredited the League of Nations – which was dissolved in 1946 because it was ineffective in taking any action against Mussolini and Hitler’s invasions—Trump openly scorns the UN, abandons important multilateral organisations that the USA helped to create, breaks consensual agreements and alliances, and treats the UN Charter as a dead letter. The message is clear, the danger is real, and we must confront it without hesitation.
 
Calling Things by Their Name
 
Even though some of Trump’s most zealous supporters, such as Elon Musk, make the Nazi salute, Trump will not appear with a small mustache and a swastika on his arm. If someone is waiting for this to happen in order to be convinced of what we are facing, they will continue fighting windmills. One common feature in most 21st century fascist movements is precisely their denial of being fascists. Milei calls himself a "libertarian," and in a 2022 interview with Veja magazine, Bolsonaro assured us that he is a "liberal". 
However, any reader who has patiently followed this series and compared the fundamental characteristics of fascism in the past century with what we experience today has surely drawn their own conclusions. All the essential traits of fascism, according to various authors, are present in the most relevant elements of today’s far-right. To recall:

    • the contemporary far right operates in a world where socialist China threatens the hegemony of  the leading capitalist country (the Soviet threat has been replaced by the Chinese threat); where parasitic financial capital dominates the economic and political landscape of capitalist nations
    • its mobilising myths revolve around “fighting the corrupt system” and “restoring the nation’s greatness”
    • it has a socially mobilised and politically organised base; where it has the strength to do so, it is aggressively imperialist
    • it is fiercely anti-communist 
    • it depends on charismatic leadership
    •  it is chauvinistic; it is irrationalist

 ...It is fascism. 

21st Century Fascism 

A fascism shaped by globalisation, the scientific-technological revolution, and social media, which manifests one of the defining characteristics of the fascist movement: massive propaganda. In other words, it is a fascism that has been influenced by and has absorbed the marks of its time. One of the fundamental tasks of anti-fascists is to unmask, with even greater emphasis, in front of the masses, the true nature of the phenomenon unfolding. 
Like its 20th century predecessor, 21st century fascism is not uniform. It retains regional and cultural peculiarities, among others. As I have pointed out, there are differences in emphasis and even characteristics that are absent in some variants and present in others. For instance, the mobilising myth of “restoring the nation’s greatness” in the USA and Europe is closely 
linked to “defending the purity” of the nation and, therefore, to fighting against immigrants. The fight against immigrants is a largely absent element in Latin American fascism, though the racist undertones inherent in the hatred toward immigrants are a common feature of all fascisms, including Brazilian, Argentine, Chilean, and Uruguayan fascism, among others. 
The epicentre of 21st century fascism is US imperialism, which is becoming increasingly violent and corrupt. As we have seen, it was imperialism that carefully nurtured the current monster and will never cease to rely on fascists to sustain its global domination project. 
Imperialism and imperialists of all shades fully understand that, in the current stage of capitalism, the total defeat of fascism would also mean the defeat of imperialism, and the downfall of imperialism would inevitably trigger a new wave of anti-capitalist demands. 
Thus, it will be impossible to wage an effective battle against 21st century fascism without a broad, united struggle guided by a clear anti-imperialist vision. 
While it is necessary to take advantage of rifts within imperialist countries and among imperialist factions to weaken them, any idea of an alliance with “moderate” sectors of the imperialist centre is a mistake that will only create vulnerabilities for future attacks. 
The primary struggle will be against the imperialist policies emanating from 
the United States –a country governed by 21st century fascism and still the most powerful in the world, holding hegemony in economic, cultural, diplomatic, and military spheres. 
On the international scene, the Trump administration follows an inverted version of Nixon and Kissinger’s logic. While in the 1970s, Nixon and Kissinger sought to separate China from Russia (the USSR) to focus on attacking the USSR, Trump intends to weaken or undermine the strategic alliance between China and Russia in order to concentrate fire on China. 
However, it is important to highlight that much of Trump’s programme is directly tied to the evident decline of the United States. The desperate attempt to find ways to “restore lost greatness” may, on the other hand, further accelerate this decline by intensifying: 

• Internal contradictions
– Even within the USA,Trump will face strong resistance. This resistance may take shape because the American bourgeoisie itself is divided on how to confront its decline. Added to this division among the ruling class is the almost inevitable sense of disillusionment that will spread among workers who placed their hopes in Trump’s promises. However, the US proletariat is equally distrustful of the Democratic Party, and all indications suggest that this distrust runs deep. This could present an opportunity for left-wing and revolutionary alternatives to gain political relevance in the USA and challenge American plutocracy from within. 
• External contradictions – External contradictions may intensify conflicts between the imperialist center and its European partners, as well as with the peoples fighting for sovereignty and development. The ongoing clash with China stands out, given that China wields significant political influence and strong global representation.
 
A Necessary Struggle
 
There will be no effective fight against fascism without popular mobilisation and without the active participation of workers and the progressive camp. However, this will not happen automatically or inevitably. It requires courage and clarity. 
And it is precisely this turbulent and uncertain global scenario, marked by crises on multiple fronts, that has the potential to spark large-scale mobilisations that once again bring to the forefront the very ideals that 21st century fascism most denies and attacks: national sovereignty, equal rights for all human beings, environmental protection, socialism, and world peace, with solidarity and fraternity among peoples. 
These ideals are like sunlight to the fascist vampire. And with unity, we must work to ensure that, better late than never, we witness the break of dawn. 


Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Shaping the future from the past


by Ben Soton 

What is history for – Essays in honour of Professor John Foster: Manifesto Press, 2024, 98pp; Pbk: rrp £10.00

Someone of a more pedantic temperament might have asked the question, what is grammar for? as the publishers omitted to include a question mark in the title. But spending too much time on detail can detract from what is actually a serious question. Whether we like it or not we are all shaped by history; that of ourselves, our families, whole nations and humanity as a whole. Marxists, however, have always viewed history through the prism of class struggle.
The Manifesto Press publication is a series of essays paying tribute to John Foster.  Foster was for many years the International Secretary of the Communist Party of Britain as well as Emeritus Professor of Social Sciences at the University of the West of Scotland.  Most noted for work is Class Struggle in the Industrial Revolution (1974) as well as various articles the national question, labour history and urban development.  
The pamphlet consists of eleven essays on a range of subjects.  In the first essay Mary Davis essentially writes a tribute to Foster. She discusses how in the late 1970s and early 1980s a number of academics attempted to water down Marxism into a purely analytical tool rather than a guide to action; examples of whom included Foucault, Wright and Cohen.
Well worth reading is Hyper Imperialism Today by VJ Prashad; who both defends Lenin’s thesis of imperialism as the highest state of capitalism whilst espousing the new theory of Hyper Imperialism. He claims there is a hyper-imperialist bloc of states led by the USA, which include the European Union, Japan as well as outlying countries such as Australia.  Prashad claims that for the first time since the development of capitalism this bloc is being challenged by a group of rivals from the Global South. These states may not be entirely anti-capitalist but they are, to a greater extent, anti-Atlanticist. The only way the Hyper-Imperialist bloc can respond is through military aggression; evidence is increased military spending in the United States and Europe.  
Another article of interest is James Crossley’s essay, Religion and English Radical History which looks at the role played by religion in the Peasants Revolt of 1381.  Meanwhile Jonathan White writes about more recent events such as the strike wave of 2022 -23 and David Horsley discusses the role of Black communists in Britain. Some are written in a highly academic style whilst others are more accessible.  
The final article by Gavin Brewis, Intergenerational psychosocial trauma: violence, social murder and the ‘space between’, was one of the articles I really struggled to unpick.  The article is more of a discussion about negative language toward marginalised groups; such as “chavs” and for those north of the border “neds”.  In recent years right-wing governments have attempted to create a hostile environment towards certain groups; witness migrants and the disabled.  When considering the Starmer Government’s cuts to disabled benefits I am reminded of a quote from the late Eric Trevett, the former General Secretary of the New Communist Party: “you don’t need gas chambers to carry out genocide”.


Monday, April 14, 2025

21st Century Fascism: Fascism Today

Ukrainian fascist militia glorifies their Nazi past
By Wevergton Brito

Wevergton Brito is vice president of the Brazilian Centre for Solidarity with Peoples and the Struggle for Peace (Cebrapaz)

 
The fascism of the 21st century took a long time to mature, and its gestation began as soon as the fascism of the past century suffered a politically, ideologically, and historically demoralising defeat in 1945. 
The epithets "fascist", “national socialist” or "Nazi-fascist" once worn with pride, became a disgrace. Even the most brutal right-wingers began to renounce fascism, which had become synonymous with crime. 
The USSR and the communist movement, which were the most important forces in the anti-fascist struggle, emerged politically strengthened from the Nazi-fascist defeat. 
To mitigate this threatening influence, imperialism reacted on multiple fronts. In the ideological sphere, it resorted to all kinds of distortions to conceal the fact that fascism was a capitalist phenomenon, supported by capitalists. The Theory of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt was, in this regard, a valuable asset for the bourgeoisie. However, Hannah Arendt’s convenient theory failed to explain why "Western democracy," supposedly anti-totalitarian, supported until their very last days the two remaining fascist dictatorships in Europe: Franco's in Spain and Salazar's in Portugal (both of which survived for three decades after the fall of the Third Reich thanks to such support). 
Not to mention the support for the Apartheid regime in South Africa, McCarthyism as well as the organisation and financing of military coups in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and many others, of which I will cite just one more example. 
In Indonesia, an anti-communist purge carried out by the military with CIA backing killed, in 1965, an estimated one million people. That’s right: one million people. The massacre installed General Hadji Mohamed Suharto in power, who would rule the country dictatorially with full U.S. support from 1967 to 1998. 
The truth is that fascist ideas have never ceased to be an instrument in the service of imperialism, one way or another. 

Neo-liberalism and the Unipolar Power of the USA

The late 1980s and early 1990s marked the dismantling of the USSR and the socialist bloc in Eastern Europe. It was the time of the temporary triumph of bourgeois ideals. Before that, the bourgeoisie had already been conducting advanced experiments in neo-liberalism – an aggressive imposition of capital aimed at destroying any social control that could create obstacles to unbridled exploitation and speculation on a global scale. 
One of the most important theorists of neo-liberalism, Wilhelm Röpke, explicitly advocated the need for a certain level of authoritarianism to overcome popular resistance to neo=liberalism: “It is possible that my view on a 'strong State' (a government that governs) is even ‘more fascist’ because I would really like to see all economic policy decisions concentrated in the hands of a vigorous and entirely independent State, unweakened by pluralist forces of a corporatist nature…people need to get used to the fact that there is also a presidential democracy, authoritarian, yes, and even – horrible dictum – a dictatorial democracy”. 
The end of the dispute between the socialist bloc, led by the USSR, and the capitalist bloc, led by the USA, with the emergence of the latter's unipolar power, radically changed the conditions of political struggle – to the detriment of the working class. 
The global imposition of neo-liberalism was a powerful expression of the bourgeoisie's ideological victory. From that point on, in terms of social representation, at best, only thematic and atomised organisations (such as NGOs) that played a passive and subordinate role in non-threatening issues would be tolerated. Collective emancipation projects would be a thing of the past. 
However, more than 30 years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, bourgeois democracy is widely discredited. How did this happen? The two main promises made after the fall of the Berlin Wall were never fulfilled. What were these promises? 

First: A World of Peace – With the end of the USSR and the socialist bloc, a world of peace and peaceful resolution of conflicts based on the United Nations Charter would be established, they claimed. Yet, the destruction of Yugoslavia and Libya, the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, the attacks on Syria, etc., quickly shattered this illusion.
 
Second – A World of Economic Prosperity
– Neo-liberal globalisation would bring economic and social progress within everyone’s reach, they asserted. Instead, in capitalist countries, wealth concentration sky-rocketed and phenomena associated with hunger and misery (begging, homelessness, etc.) emerged even in imperialist core nations. 
In 2015, a study by the Economic Policy Institute (USA) found that the purchasing power of American workers had been practically stagnant since 1978. The report introduction stated: 
“The wage stagnation of the vast majority of workers was not caused by abstract economic trends. On the contrary, wages were suppressed by policy choices made in favour of those who hold more income, wealth, and power”.
 
In the USA and Europe, new generations struggle to maintain the standard of living their parents enjoyed, which has profoundly affected the middle classes. This recalls Umberto Eco’s warning: “One of the characteristics of historical fascisms was the appeal to frustrated middle classes, devalued by some economic crisis or political humiliation”. 
Work has become precarious and devalued. Social mobility has drastically declined, and studies by non-Marxist economists, such as the French economist Thomas Piketty, highlight the growing trend toward the formation of a global financial oligarchy. 
On the other hand, especially in Europe, communist parties, which for decades were the main references for the most combative sector of the proletariat and the channels through which anti-system opinion was expressed, either dissolved in the face of the collapse of the socialist bloc or followed the path of transformation into parties of the Establishment. Some changed their names, programmes, and objectives. Others preserved their identities, though in some cases making serious ideological concessions and, in almost all cases, being strongly impacted by the defeat of the socialist bloc. This resulted in a sharp decline in political influence, during a phase of strategic retreat for the revolutionary movement. 
Within the broader left-wing spectrum, social-democratic parties – some of which even retained the designation "socialist" – fully embraced the neo-liberal and Atlanticist agenda. In Portugal, France, and Italy, to name just a few examples, it was social democracy that dismantled much of the welfare state, degraded labour conditions, and blindly adhered to the dictates of NATO and the United States. 
Disillusionment and discontent are gripping the masses. This phenomenon, with its own nuances and characteristics, has been repeated across the globe, leaving part of the proletariat and middle strata without viable alternatives on the horizon, leading to a sense of political and ideological orphanhood, making them easy prey for the falsely anti-system demagoguery of the far right. 
In Italy, in the 2022 election, the "Regioni Rosse" (Red Regions) –  historically the electoral stronghold of the communists of the former Communist Party of Italy – voted overwhelmingly for the fascists of the Fratelli d'Italia (Brothers of Italy) party, led by current Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. The motto of  "Brothers of Italy" is "God, Homeland, and Family," and their symbol is a tricolour flame representing the fire rising from Mussolini's tomb. 
Here, we must highlight the different political developments of European social democracy compared to some sectors of Latin American social democracy after the Second World War. 
While in Europe, social-democratic parties generally became direct representatives of capital and imperialism, in Latin America, many parties of this tradition maintained anti-imperialist orientations and commitments to progressive popular causes. Examples include the Socialist Party of Salvador Allende in Chile and, much later in Brazil, the Democratic Labour Party (PDT) of Brizola, and more prominently, the Workers' Party (PT) of Lula. 
This is one of the factors that may help explain why Latin America became a global bastion of resistance to the hegemonic neo-liberal agenda starting in the 1990s. 
At the beginning of the 1990s, there was only one left-wing government in Latin America and the Caribbean: Cuba. From Mexico to Argentina, neoliberalism was triumphant. However, the neo-liberal project sparked waves of popular discontent. 
Resistance and struggle arose in every corner of the region. After the initial shock of the collapse of the socialist bloc – and despite the various interpretations of the causes and significance of that downfall – the committed Latin American left, with the active participation of communist parties, understood the need to find broad forms of action, demonstrating mobilisation and organisational capacity. 
In 1998, Hugo Chávez won the presidential elections in Venezuela. In successive years, progressive forces won elections in Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Paraguay, Honduras, and El Salvador. 
Public policies were implemented to combat hunger and social injustices. The sovereign integration of Latin America and the Caribbean gained unprecedented momentum, with the creation or strengthening of mechanisms such as Mercosur, Unasur, CELAC, and ALBA. 
For the first time in nearly 100 years – since the early 20th century, when they consolidated continental hegemony – the Americans could no longer treat the region as their backyard. They had to watch as the continent as a whole gravitated increasingly toward China, and to some extent, Russia.
 
the "end of history" 
 
The victory over the socialist bloc in the late 1980s convinced capitalism that its model of bourgeois democracy was destined to be the mandatory and eternal standard. "It is the end of history," proclaimed one of its ideologues, Francis Fukuyama. 
Such was their confidence that fascist ideas and methods were relegated to a secondary role, as a tactical reserve. Even in the most developed capitalist countries, there was some progress on cultural and social issues that posed no real threat to the bourgeoisie's class power. But that phase, in historical terms, lasted only a blink of an eye. 
A growing challenge to US unipolar dominance, led by the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation, began to take shape, making the emergence of a multipolar world an undeniable reality. In 2009, the presidents of Brazil, Russia, India, and China met in Moscow, and two years later, with South Africa's inclusion, the BRICS bloc was born. 
In 2013, China launched a new proposal for economic globalisation: the "Belt & Road Initiative" also known as the New Silk Road. This project challenges neo-liberal globalisation, which seeks to perpetuate relations of subservience, as it is based on the Chinese President Xi Jinping’s thesis of "shared development for humanity." 
Faced with powerful geopolitical shifts –including movements in Asia, Eurasia, and Africa that began contesting US unipolar power, the anti-neoliberal resistance in Latin America, and the growing discontent of workers and the middle classes in Europe—the "tactical reserve" arsenal of fascism was once again activated. Anti-communist, authoritarian, racist, misogynistic, and irrationalist rhetoric gained new momentum. 
In Latin America, which we will discuss further, the experience of progressive governments was constantly under attack. There were periods of greater stability, but never of a truce. 
What was once hidden in the sewers has begun to emerge, aided by imperialism and the traditional right wing, which, it must be noted, skilfully exploited the limits, mistakes, and shortcomings of the progressive camp. 

The Return of the Big Lie 
 
A close reading of the book in which Hitler laid out his profession of faith, Mein Kampf, reveals that the Nazi leader was deeply fascinated by the use of lies as a mass manipulation technique. According to Hitler, the use of a colossal, absurd lie would always leave the public with some doubt that there must be some truth in a "Big Lie," because no one would be crazy enough to invent such nonsense unless there was some real basis for it. 
Using the pretext of “denouncing” the so-called “Jewish and Marxist lies” Hitler could not conceal what was, in fact, a strategic proposal for his movement and his main propaganda technique, which became known as the “Big Lie” method “… in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper layers of their emotional nature …and thus, in the primitive simplicity of their minds, they fall more easily victim to the big lie than to the small lie…t would never enter their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the audacity to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts that prove this may be clearly brought to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and continue to think that there might be some other explanation” (Hitler, in Mein Kampf). 
And indeed, this method was applied with resounding success by the Nazis, convincing millions of Germans that communism was a Jewish invention and that Germany lost the First World War due to the betrayal of Jews and communists. 
The journalist William Shirer, a staunch conservative, witnessed first-hand the Nazis' rise to power and reports in his book The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: “Many times in a German home or office, or sometimes in casual conversations with a stranger in a restaurant, a beer hall, a café, I came across the most exotic statements from seemingly educated and intelligent people. It was evident that they were repeating some absurd excerpt heard on the radio or read in the newspapers. Sometimes I was tempted to point out certain truths, but on these occasions, I was met with such a look of disbelief, such shocking silence, as if I had blasphemed against the Almighty, to the point that I understood the futility of trying to reach a mind that had been perverted and for whom the facts of life had been transformed into whatever Hitler and Goebbels, with their cynical disdain for the truth, said they were”. 
Shirer’s account is shockingly relevant today, as it reflects the experiences of any anti-fascist engaging with friends and family who support 21st century fascism, regardless of the country in which they operate, with few exceptions. 
Without a doubt, the Trumpist Steve Bannon and his acolytes have studied this technique. With the rise of social media, the effectiveness of the “Big Lie” has been amplified and deployed on a global scale, with the undisguised complicity of mainstream media when it served their interests. Often, by the time it ceased to be convenient, the damage was already irreparable. The monster had taken on a life of its own. 
Millions of Americans firmly believe that Joe Biden is a communist and that communists rigged the 2020 US election. During the last US election, I saw on TV a Trump supporter declaring to a reporter that Democrats control hurricanes and tornadoes, directing them toward areas with more Republican voters. This claim circulated on social media before the election and was “confirmed” by a Trumpist Congresswoman, Marjorie Taylor Greene, who stated, “Yes, they can control the weather”. Perhaps not even Hitler could have imagined such a degree of insanity. 
(