Review
by Ben Soton
Tolkien
(2019). Director: Dome
Karukoski; Writers: David Gleeson,
Stephen Beresford; Stars: Nicholas
Hoult, Lily Collins,
Colm Meaney. PG-13; 112mins.
A
young boy, due to a loss of income, is forced to move from the English
countryside to industrial Birmingham. Later on, a group of teenage boys are
ejected from a tea room for chatting up a waitress. These scenes are interlaced
with images from the First World War. It seems like Christopher Robin meets Peaky Blinders mixed with Inbetweeners and Blackadder Goes Forth.
This is a film about the life of John
Ronald Reuel Tolkien, played by Nicholas Hoult.
Tolkien was an academic authority on Old English and Old Norse
literature, but he is best known as author of the Hobbit, Lord of the Rings and the Silmarillion.
The film revolves around the influences in
Tolkien’s early life that inspired his novels.
These included the friendships he developed during his schooldays, the horrors
of the First World War and his interest in nature. In the scenes from the First
World War he is aided by a Baldrick-like soldier of short stature; perhaps the
influence behind the Hobbits. In his childhood he is guided by a Catholic
priest, Father Francis Morgan played by Colm Meaney; perhaps an inspiration for
Gandalf. The film allows the viewer to make up their own mind.
Tolkien also created his own language,
Elvish, which was influenced by a number of Northern European languages. The
film features Derek Jacobi as Professor Joseph Wright, a linguistics expert who
influenced Tolkien. Wright talks about how languages bond peoples together and
give a common heritage; this sounds fine but such ideas are a major element of
conservative and even fascist ideology. It is worth reminding readers that
Tolkien, a staunch Roman Catholic, was a fervent supporter of General Franco in
the Spanish Civil War although he did stop short of supporting Hitler.
Although Tolkien publicly rejected any
analogies to contemporary events, it has been claimed that the villain Suaron
was based on Joseph Stalin. Successful fantasy however, has to have a
relationship to the present or the past. The Lord of the Rings and Hobbit}
stories feature various groups of fictional beings.
The Hobbits resemble rural villagers and
their home, The Shire, seems to resemble the English countryside. The dwarves
appear more like an industrial proletariat, possibly from the Celtic fringe.
The Elves, with their intellectual superiority and faster reflexes, are an
elite charged with stewardship over the rest of the fictional Middle Earth.
Evil in this world seems to come from some kind of force upsetting a delicate
balance. An essentially conservative world view.
Fantasy often romanticises the past. To an
extent the film does this with the Edwardian era, where much of the film is
set. We are shown elaborately decorated tea rooms, the romance between Tolkien
and his future wife Edith Bratt, played by Lilly Collins, and the friendships
between Tolkien and a group of fellow students. This period is often described
as the ‘Belle Epoch’ or the ‘Indian Summer’, a period spoilt by the outbreak
of war in 1914. If you are a fan of Tolkien the film is worth seeing because it
gives an insight into the ideas behind stories that, whatever the shortcomings
of the author, have stood the test of time.
No comments:
Post a Comment