They
say that Theresa May left Birmingham slightly happier than when she arrived for
the Conservatives’ conference that her supporters feared would close with a
fatal challenge to her lack-lustre leadership. Prancing around to the tune of Dancing Queen drew predictable cheers
from the faithful, there to hear the usual platitudes that they hope will steer
them through to victory at the next election.
Whether Mrs May will still lead them is
another matter altogether. But whilst a number of Tory grandees covet her job
none of them, not even the immensely vain Boris Johnson, were prepared to
trigger a leadership challenge that could seal her fate or destroy their own
political careers in the offing.
This isn’t really a good time to be Tory
leader, let alone Prime Minister, with the party deeply divided over Brexit –
which should, in theory at least, take place on 29th March 2019. All
of this is a matter of indifference to working people however, who can expect
no favours from Tory governments of whatever persuasion and, in any case, have
no say in the matter.
Divisions within the Tory ranks over the
European Union mean that parliament could vote down the final withdrawal bill
in 2019 whatever the outcome of the talks in Brussels. This will strengthen the
hand of the Remainers clamouring for a second referendum, which they believe
can reverse the original Brexit vote.
For us the issue is clear. We want another
election to get Labour in and the Tories out. We want Labour to stand by the
people’s vote to leave the European Union without any ifs or buts. And the
surest guarantee of Brexit is a massive majority for Labour at the next
election.
The never-ending
saga
Meanwhile,
the May government is milking the Skripal affair for all its worth to demonise
Russia and justify further NATO expansion in the Middle East. Last week the {Telegraph} told us that a third Russian
intelligence officer had been identified as an accomplice by counter-terrorism
police and the security services in the alleged Novichok attack on the Russian
defector and his daughter in Salisbury in March.
There are several possibilities behind the
poisoning of the retired spy, who had been released by the Russian government
in a spy swap with Britain. It is unlikely they would release him if they
wanted to kill him. Why can’t these unnamed intelligence sources give us a
credible reason for Russian involvement in the Skripal affair?
Perhaps the answer to this riddle lies in
Syria, where the Assad government and the Russians have long accused the NATO
powers of using the bogus ‘White Helmets’ to fabricate false-flag poison gas
attacks on civilians to provide the pretext for NATO attacks on Syrian
government targets.
The White Helmets are a NATO-backed front
that was set up by a British intelligence officer in 2014. They posed as an
independent search and rescue service dedicated to helping civilians caught up
in the Syrian civil war. They were founded by James Le Mesurier, a former
British army intelligence officer, who has taken part in various British and NATO
deployments in Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq and Lebanon.
The Kremlin is calling for inspections by
the Organisation of the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) to investigate
Russian and Syrian claims. These efforts are being blocked by US imperialism
and its other NATO allies whilst Britain has launched another diversion,
warning Russia that it will pay a “high price” if it continues to use chemical
weapons following the Salisbury nerve agent attack.
That is why some observers believe that
the real motive behind the Skripal affair is simply to provide a reason for
excluding Russia from any future international investigation into the use of
chemical weapons in Syria.
No comments:
Post a Comment