Showing posts with label Trotskyism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trotskyism. Show all posts

Monday, May 10, 2021

fight the real fight!

This week is election week up and down the country. While mainstream parties battle for control of local councils, devolved assemblies and the regional governments in Scotland and Wales others run simply to make a point.
     Some like the stand-up comics who pose as “Count Binface” or “Lord Buckethead” do it for laughs and to raise money for charity. Others take it more seriously like Laurence Fox who is running for the London Mayoralty in what looks suspiciously like a publicity campaign to promote his acting career. He faces competition from Brian Rose, a cranky former American banker who leads the “London Real Party”, who drinks his own pee and promotes conspiracy theories on his popular YouTube channel.
     So spare a thought for the band of hapless left social-democrats who are standing in England, Scotland and Wales this week. They range from the absurd “Northern Independence Party” and whatever George Galloway’s followers call themselves these days to old-time Trots and revisionists who have learned nothing over the past fifty years.
    The fact that these platforms are rejected time and time again by the same working class these programmes claim to advance, never deters these pseudo-revolutionaries who believe they can change the consciousness of the masses through rhetoric and wild promises.
    Some argue that they split the Labour vote and let the Tories in by the back-door. But this misses the point. These people usually only get support from the sort of people who might otherwise vote for Buckethead or the Loonies – a “protest” vote than rarely gets beyond the low hundreds these days.
    Standing left candidates without mass support against Labour divides the movement and the class and ignores the obvious fact that the only realistic alternatives are those of the Tories, Scottish nationalists and the Liberal Democrats that have been, and would be, much worse than any Labour administration.
     Disaffected Labour voters generally abstain or turn to another mainstream alternative. Past beneficiaries include the Liberal Democrats and the Scottish National Party. At the last elections a significant number even switched to the Tories over Brexit. But few ever succumb to the allure of the self-styled “revolutionary” left. All these left posers do is simply reinforce the erroneous belief that the class collaborationist ideas of social democracy can be defeated by simply imitating it in the countless variations of the British Road to Socialism upheld by the revisionist, pseudo-communist and Trotskyist movements in Britain today. At the same time they reinforce the legitimacy of the Westminster parliament that creates the illusion of the bourgeois “democracy” that we live in today.
    There have been exceptions. But they only served to prove the rule. The two communist MPs who sat in the House of Commons during the Attlee era achieved next to nothing. George Galloway, who returned to the House of Commons on his own Respect ticket, achieved even less. That’s possibly why he barely even bothered to attend sessions of that august body.
    We can all play games and conjure up imaginary legions beyond the British working class to take us down the revolutionary road. We can all invent a class that is seething with anger and mobilised for revolutionary change that is just waiting for the correct party with the correct formula to lead them to victory. But the real struggle to defeat the class-collaborators and agents within the labour movement is being fought inside the trade unions and the Labour Party today. That’s where we need to be. We are communists. We work with the working class that exists and not the phantom of romantic ultra-leftism.

Friday, January 11, 2019

A Radical History of the World?


Review

by Ben Soton


A Radical History of the World by Neil Faulkner, 2018. Pluto Press: London.
Paperback, 592pp £14.99; ISBN: 9780745338040.
(ISBN:
9780745338057 Hardback; ISBN: 9780745338040 Paperback; ISBN: 9781786803276 PDF eBook; ISBN: 9781786803290 Kindle eBook; ISBN: 9781786803283 EPUB eBook)

Neil Faulkner’s latest work is the second edition of a 2013 publication A Marxist History of the World – Neanderthals to Neo-Liberals. Before you head to Waterstones or log to Amazon however – buyer beware. The author is former member of the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) and now involved in Momentum. The SWP and its Third Camp Trotskyism are the safe radicalism of Radio Four panel games and sections of academia. With this in mind, the SWP finds itself on the same side as the British state in conflicts such as Ukraine and Syria. During the counter-revolutions of 1989 they were happy to act as cheer-leaders to imperialism.
The book is best viewed in two parts. The first 12 chapters cover human history from the time of hunter-gathers, through the establishment of class society with the agricultural revolution. It covers the empires of the ancient world, feudalism and the development of capitalism.
Faulkner’s work is one of many books attempting to summarise the entirety of human history in one volume. Others include Andrew Marr’s A History of the World, A Little History of the World by EH Gombrich and the more light-hearted Horrible History of The World by Terry Deary.
This poses several questions; can all of human history be summarised in one volume? Equally these works contain little or no primary research and, although not actually plagiarism, are they not simply amalgams of other historians’ works?
At the same time they can give the reader an overview of history, encouraging them to undertake further reading.
Faulkner cites the works of Marxist historians such as Maurice Dobb, Christopher Hill and Eric Hobsbawn and numerous other historians, but he also draws heavily on the works of the SWP guru Tony Cliff.
Third Camp Trotskyism inevitable shows its head in the later chapters of this book. According to Faulkner the Russian Revolution was betrayed by Joseph Stalin in the 1920s and a system of ‘State Capitalism’ was established. One has to ask the question, if capitalism was restored in the 1920s then what happened in 1991?
Secondly, in an earlier chapter he explains the meaning of capitalism – a system nothing like the former Soviet Union.
Finally, I can remember the counter-revolutions of 1989–91, not with any great pleasure I should point out. These events saw relatively equal societies replaced by highly unequal ones. I can remember, at best misguided (namely guided by imperialism), individuals breaking into the homes of Communist Party leaders expecting to find Babylonian luxury; instead finding somewhat dull looking furnishings.
The author predictably compares the Soviet Union to Nazi Germany and the Japanese Empire. He rightly describes the Second World War, with all its horrors, as a tragedy – but the Second World War resulted in the defeat of fascism, with the Soviet Union contributing the lion’s share. It also led to the end of European colonial empires; Britain and France being the largest. Specifically, it led to a shift in the global balance of class forces in favour of the working class. This could be seen by the creation of a socialist camp, stronger communist parties and the growth of national liberation movements. In Britain it led to the establishment of the NHS and the ‘welfare state’, powerful trade unions and the use of Keynesian economics, which prioritised the alleviation of poverty. It is these gains that successive neo-liberal governments have been undermining since the late 1970s.
The book takes us up to the financial crash of 2008, the austerity regime and the subsequent resistance. Faulkner concludes with a call to arms against global capitalism and its inherent side effects: climate change, war, global poverty and inequality. We would all agree with this but can a movement with such a distorted view of the 20th century play a positive role in the 21st?