by Alain Fissore
and Stefano Rosatelli
On
Sunday the 4th December 2016 Italians were asked to express their opinion on a
controversial referendum to change or preserve the Republic’s Constitution. On
the one hand the “yes” vote was in favour of constitutional changes, on the
other hand the “no” vote meant the Constitution would be preserved.
Italy’s
Constitution is the outcome of a series of political agreements reached after
the Second World War, amongst all the anti-fascist parties of that period, in
order to give the Italian Republic (Monarchy or Republic referendum on the 2nd
June 1946) a framework of rules aiming to create a parliamentary democracy
within a bourgeois political system.
Today’s
Italian Constitution is still the same one of 69 years ago, although there have
been a few corrections to some of its articles, or even changes, made by
different Governments since its official usage in 1946. Its role in guaranteeing
a balance amongst Government, Prime Minister, Parliament, Italy’s legal system
and the President of the Republic is of paramount importance in contemporary
Italy, and, as in the late 1940s, it is still a valid tool for people’s
participation in politics.
Social democrat premier Matteo Renzi’s
constitutional reform was only the last of three recent constitutional reforms
that were attempted or partially achieved in the last 20 years by three
different Prime Ministers: Massimo D’Alema (2001), Silvio Berlusconi (2006)
and, obviously, Matteo Renzi in 2016.
Like previous failed reforms, a YES vote
would have meant changes to the composition and powers of the Italian
Parliament, ending Italy’s “perfect bicameralism (bicameralismo perfetto)” [a parliament comprising two
chambers/assemblies/houses, such as in Italy or the UK] by reducing the powers
and size of the Senate (no more directly elected by the Italian electorate but
voted by regional governments’ members), and by transferring more powers to the
Government instead.
The
reformed Constitution meant that any elected Government would have had more
power than the Parliament, regardless of its actual electoral consensus.
Renzi’s reform was linked to the approval of a new voting system based on a
large-majority “reward” (premio di
maggioranza) given to any political party able to win future general
elections, even with a small margin of votes from Italians or even with a low
turnout of voters, which is something really common nowadays in Europe.
During the past months, Italy’s Partito
Comunista was one of the many parties opposing Renzi’s reform, a reform
actually designed and requested by the Troika – the International Monetary Fund
(IMF), the European Central Bank (ECB) and the European Union (EU). The Partito
Comunista set up its own referendum committee for the NO vote, and started to
campaign in newspapers and on national television channels. In total there were
14 committees in favour of the reform and 21 committees opposing it, in a
referendum that, as many people in Britain know, saw parties from the Left, the
Centre and the Right campaigning in the streets, squares, schools and
workplaces all around Italy.
The
response of the Italian people, and particularly of the Italian working class,
in rejecting the constitutional reform, advertised by Matteo Renzi as an
improvement to Italian politics, was outstanding, with a turnout of 65.47 per
cent of Italians going to vote and 59.11 per cent of Italian voters saying
clearly “NO”. Such a result was particularly positive for us communists because
it meant that Renzi’s political opportunism and arrogance were defeated,
together with the Troika’s campaign of psychological terror based on
catastrophic social and economic outcomes for the Italian people, due to the
win of the NO vote. But is the NO vote enough to establish a positive future
for the Italian working class?
As Communists, we know very well that the
rejection of the constitutional Referendum is only the first step of a struggle
that is going to involve us, Partito Comunista’s militants, and the Italian
people in the next decade. A struggle that is also linked to a wider struggle
belonging to the international working class and lower middle class that
started in Europe with the LEAVE vote in the Brexit referendum last June. The
contemporary capitalist “golden chains” can only be broken with the collapse of
the EU and with the creation of Socialist nations all around Europe. Brexit and
the Italian Referendum in December show us that only a social union of classes
that share the same economic interests can defeat the greed of international
banks, insurance companies and multinational companies (the modern private
monopolies of international capitalism).
For such a reason, we hope the peoples of
Europe may rise up, once and for all, against the Troika, the EU and NATO!
The authors are members of the ‘Sezione Pietro
Secchia’, the British branch of Italy’s Partito Comunista
No comments:
Post a Comment