By
Adrian Chan-Wyles
In
the 21st century, with the ever deepening process of globalisation
and the development of information technology, human society is facing new and
challenging problems. Due to the unprecedented complexity of these problems, a
superior and outstanding wisdom is required. But as the development of
information is at its height, knowledge can be retrieved at any time. The rapid development of science and
technology has led to unprecedented material growth, and this in turn has led
to an accelerated rate of development of education in modern society. There is now an urgent need to develop the
subject of Wisdom Studies so that society can benefit fully from its
presence.
Zhangjiagang
Wisdom Studies Declaration - 2013
THE HUMAN brain, through its capacity to
think, analyse, assess, and logically organise, has given birth to two great
outpourings of the intellect, namely religion and secular science. The former
is represented by a mixture of imagination and environmental observation,
whilst the latter abandons a priori the requirement for imagination and
strictly limits itself purely to the observation of natural processes.
Although now perceived as two very different
entities, which of course they are, religion and science have shared, to a
lesser or greater degree, the capacity to generate “wisdom”. The concept of generating wise thoughts is
signified by the ability to produce optimum psychological functioning that
simultaneously combines the observation of the environment, with specific inner
cognitive processes.
In the case of
religion, the various phases of environmental change, such as the passing of
the seasons, weather conditions, natural catastrophes, the cycle of life,
conflict and so on, are used to reinforce the inner generation of religiously
significant imagery. But in the case of modern science the environment is not
just passively observed by a human mind standing in awe of its presence, but is
dynamically “measured” and “understood” by a mind that actively seeks to reduce
and remove imagination from the empirical process of information gathering.
Both religious systems and modern science
signify the development of the human mind (and its capacity to be “wise”) at
various stages of its cognitive evolution but it is interesting to note that “wisdom”
as a distinct capacity, appears to have been a prominent biological and
physical attribute of humanity generated through the constant environmental
pressures with regards for the need to survive as a species.
When wisdom is
interpreted in this manner it becomes a perennial capacity that has accompanied
human evolutionary development, but the origin of which most likely lies in
humanity’s pre-human ancestry. As soon
as a functioning brain is aware of the environment, (and its place within it),
perception is transformed from subject-object dichotomy to a
subject-object-other perspective. In other words from a strictly two-dimensional,
instinctively governed existence, to a three-dimensional awareness that is able
to “think” beyond, round, and through its otherwise powerful instinctive
programming. This is wisdom as
self-awareness. As a capacity of thought
generation and thought organisation, wisdom has had the task of formulating
contingent responses to inner and outer stimuli, that is information derived
from the experience of psycho-emotional and psycho-physical states of
being.
Wisdom answers
the question as to “what does this sensory information mean?” This is a continuous path of human evolution
that has no end, as it is an unfolding process of the continuous refinement of
the observation and understanding of inner and outer processes. From this process has emerged the modern
science that has benefitted the planet, albeit in an asymmetric manner due to
the difference in socio-economic development around the globe.
The wisdom
manifested by those who live in economic poverty is of a more organic nature
than those who exist in economically advanced societies, and whose wisdom is
routinely augmented by technological assistance. In a poor country, the apex of wisdom may
manifest as the ability to grow crops effectively and make obsolete machinery
function despite a lack of spare parts or replacements, and so on, whereas in a
rich country, advanced wisdom builds space-rockets and devises ever more
effective medicines, and so on.
Wisdom is a
human-wide phenomenon that is not linked to any one culture, ethnic group, or
society, and it is clear from the observation that many great civilisations,
such as the Egyptian, Chinese, Indian, Babylonian, Greek, Roman, Inca, Mayan,
North American Indian, Celtic, and modern European, amongst many others, have
produced cultures and architectural constructs that contain an obviously
advanced quota of developmental “wisdom”.
This is why it is significant that on the 10th
December 2013, a group of eminent Chinese academics issued the Zhangjiagang
Wisdom Studies Declaration, which simultaneously recognises the importance of
the study (and development) of the theory of wisdom research, and the founding
of the International Wisdom Society (IWS). This is an important recognition
that will see the subject of wisdom studies advance and gain a greater depth of
understanding. In recent years, knowledgeable people, both inside China and
abroad, have started paying attention to this issue, and have begun to promote
awareness of the emerging academic discipline of Wisdom Studies.
In the United States first there was the
famous Psychologist Robert J Steinberg who led a group of scholars in a
spontaneous research programme in Wisdom Studies. Following this, there was the development of
Wisdom Studies carried out at the University of Chicago. In Europe there is the “‘Berlin Wisdom
Paradigm” which has a group of Wisdom Study researchers. In China during the
last 50 years of the 20th century there was the famous educator Luo
Jia Lun who considered the relation between wisdom, learning, and
knowledge. He produced a penetrating
analysis of the three inter-related subjects.
Qian Xue Sen |
The famous
scientist Qian Xue Sen, (as far back as the mid-1990s), proposed a “Great
Compendium of Wisdom Studies” school of thought. In the 21st century the famous
educator Gu Ming Yuan, the President of the Chinese Association of Education,
developed the academic subject of Wisdom Studies. Within China there has been
the development of the Chinese Wisdom Project Research Council, together with
the emergence of the International Chinese Wisdom Society in Hong Kong, as well
as the Zhangjiagang City Wisdom Studies Project, and other similar academic
institutes.
As a consequence
there have been a number of important academic conferences held, and many
pioneering papers published on the subjects of wisdom, learning, and knowledge,
which have led to the development of a practical curriculum designed
specifically for Wisdom Studies. The academic brothers Zhang Qing Lin and Zhang
Qing Song are credited with designing and implementing the first “Learning
Wisdom in College” courses, which have achieved many important results.
However,
whether in China or the United States of America and despite the fact that
leaders in both countries clearly advocate the development of wise thinking
amongst the people, it has to be acknowledged that Wisdom Studies (and the
ability to “think” wisely) is an acquired skill, and that there must be
appropriate planning if it is to be made socially acceptable and relevant to
the masses. In this regard, Wisdom
Studies remains in its initial stage of development.
But now that
there are “Wisdom Cities”, “Wisdom Tourism”, and “Wisdom Study Schools” serves
to illustrate the success of the project and the willingness of people to
embrace wisdom. In fact intelligence is
the facility people use when choosing their words and actions – and it can be
said that Wisdom Studies encourages the development of a clearer (and superior)
thinking process. Wise thinking can be
used to tackle the most difficult of problems with an innovation that is
capable of producing new inventions.
Amongst the workers, the use of wise thought is the foundation of the
generation of all productive forces.
No comments:
Post a Comment